MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25259/sni_99_2024

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2024

Intracranial mycotic aneurysm rupture following cupping therapy.

Dai Monami, Suzuki Kaima, Sato Hiroki, Tabata Shinya, Kume Haruka, Nishikata Masaya, Tamada Keita, Ooigawa Hidetoshi, Kurita Hiroki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cupping therapy is an alternative treatment that uses a small glass cup to suck the skin with a needle and has been used to manage skin problems and pain. However, serious complications have been reported. Herein, we describe a case of intracranial mycotic aneurysm rupture after cupping therapy.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 25-year-old male patient presented with a headache and fever after cupping therapy for atopic dermatitis. He was diagnosed with infective endocarditis, and antibiotic therapy was initiated. After that, he suddenly lost consciousness, and head imaging revealed a cerebral hemorrhage due to a ruptured intracranial mycotic aneurysm. He underwent craniotomy, which was successful, and he was transferred to a rehabilitation center with a modified Rankin scale score of 2 at three months post-stroke.

CONCLUSION

This case serves as a reminder of life-threatening infectious complication risks after cupping therapy. A patient who has a compromised skin barrier may experience serious adverse effects, especially when cupping is performed without implementing suitable infection prevention measures.

Для цитирования: Dai Monami, Suzuki Kaima, Sato Hiroki, Tabata Shinya, Kume Haruka, Nishikata Masaya, Tamada Keita, Ooigawa Hidetoshi, Kurita Hiroki. Intracranial mycotic aneurysm rupture following cupping therapy.. Surgical neurology international. 2024. DOI: 10.25259/sni_99_2024.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.