Journal of dentistry · 2026
Dentists' choice of treatment for root caries - a qualitative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Götze Nirina, Sommerfeldt Wiebke, Gellert Paul, Müller Anne, Göstemeyer Gerd
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Despite existing recommendations for root caries treatment, their implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent. This qualitative study explores the factors influencing dentists' decision-making in selecting appropriate therapies for root caries.
METHODS: A structured interview guide was designed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and 15 semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with dentists (mean (min/max) professional experience: 14.8 (3/48) years). The interview transcripts were analysed using the TDF and the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify key motivations behind treatment choices for root caries.
RESULTS: Data saturation was reached, and a total of 34 barriers, facilitators or conflicting themes were identified that aligned to all COM-B domains. Main barriers included limited awareness of current diagnostic and treatment guidelines, a lack of sufficient incentives for root caries therapy and the perception of root caries management as a frustrating task. Facilitators included viewing root caries management as a high-priority task and a strong interest in offering evidence-based management options.
CONCLUSION: Root caries management is complex and often under-prioritized, despite clinicians' motivation to provide quality care. Knowledge gaps, emotional strain, and systemic disincentives hinder effective treatment and need to be addressed to improve outcomes.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies behavioural, emotional, and systemic barriers that contribute to continued invasive management of root caries despite evidence-based recommendations for non-invasive care of early lesions, particularly in older and care-dependent patients. Identifying these barriers may support more consistent adoption of evidence-based approaches in routine dental practice.
METHODS: A structured interview guide was designed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and 15 semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with dentists (mean (min/max) professional experience: 14.8 (3/48) years). The interview transcripts were analysed using the TDF and the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify key motivations behind treatment choices for root caries.
RESULTS: Data saturation was reached, and a total of 34 barriers, facilitators or conflicting themes were identified that aligned to all COM-B domains. Main barriers included limited awareness of current diagnostic and treatment guidelines, a lack of sufficient incentives for root caries therapy and the perception of root caries management as a frustrating task. Facilitators included viewing root caries management as a high-priority task and a strong interest in offering evidence-based management options.
CONCLUSION: Root caries management is complex and often under-prioritized, despite clinicians' motivation to provide quality care. Knowledge gaps, emotional strain, and systemic disincentives hinder effective treatment and need to be addressed to improve outcomes.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies behavioural, emotional, and systemic barriers that contribute to continued invasive management of root caries despite evidence-based recommendations for non-invasive care of early lesions, particularly in older and care-dependent patients. Identifying these barriers may support more consistent adoption of evidence-based approaches in routine dental practice.