Clinical nuclear medicine · 2011
A comparative study of fused FDG PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CT imaging for assessing surrounding tissue invasion of advanced buccal squamous cell carcinoma.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Shu-Hua, Chien Chi-Yen, Lin Wei-Che, Fang Fu-Min, Wang Pei-Wen, Lui Chun-Chung, Huang Yung-Cheng, Hung Bor-Tau, Tu Min-Chien, Chang Chiung-Chih
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of fused fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) compared with PET/computed tomography (CT), MRI, and CT in assessing surrounding tissue invasion of advanced buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET/CT and MRI were performed in 17 consecutive patients with suspected masticator space invasion of BSCC from CT images. Attenuation-corrected PET and head and neck MRI datasets were registered. For pathologic correlation, 4 regions of interest were examined, including the maxilla, mandible, pterygoid, and masseter muscle. The tumor maximal diameter, measured by different imaging modalities, was correlated with pathology results.
RESULTS: All PET/MRI fusions were verified as well matched using specific anatomic criteria. For pathology results, 1 patient had inflammation only, 1 had spindle cell cancer, and 15 had squamous cell cancer. Of 64 regions of interest, 20 (31.3%) harbored tumor invasion. The likelihood ratio was highest in fused PET/MRI (42.56) compared with PET/CT (25.02), MRI (22.94), and CT (8.6; all P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of fused PET/MRI were also highest among the 4 modalities (90.0%/90.9%, 80.0%/84.1%, 80.0%/79.5%, and 55.0%/81.8%, respectively). The level of confidence was higher in fused PET/MRI or MRI than in PET/CT or CT (85.9%, 85.9%, 70.3%, 73.4%, respectively). The maximal lesion size was 3.0 to 6.0 cm in the pathology specimen. Regression analysis showed better agreement between fused PET/MRI and pathology results.
CONCLUSIONS: Fused PET/MRI is more reliable for focal invasion assessment and tumor size delineation in advanced BSCC compared with PET/CT, MRI, and CT. PET/CT has the lowest confidence level, which may limit its use in the clinical setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET/CT and MRI were performed in 17 consecutive patients with suspected masticator space invasion of BSCC from CT images. Attenuation-corrected PET and head and neck MRI datasets were registered. For pathologic correlation, 4 regions of interest were examined, including the maxilla, mandible, pterygoid, and masseter muscle. The tumor maximal diameter, measured by different imaging modalities, was correlated with pathology results.
RESULTS: All PET/MRI fusions were verified as well matched using specific anatomic criteria. For pathology results, 1 patient had inflammation only, 1 had spindle cell cancer, and 15 had squamous cell cancer. Of 64 regions of interest, 20 (31.3%) harbored tumor invasion. The likelihood ratio was highest in fused PET/MRI (42.56) compared with PET/CT (25.02), MRI (22.94), and CT (8.6; all P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of fused PET/MRI were also highest among the 4 modalities (90.0%/90.9%, 80.0%/84.1%, 80.0%/79.5%, and 55.0%/81.8%, respectively). The level of confidence was higher in fused PET/MRI or MRI than in PET/CT or CT (85.9%, 85.9%, 70.3%, 73.4%, respectively). The maximal lesion size was 3.0 to 6.0 cm in the pathology specimen. Regression analysis showed better agreement between fused PET/MRI and pathology results.
CONCLUSIONS: Fused PET/MRI is more reliable for focal invasion assessment and tumor size delineation in advanced BSCC compared with PET/CT, MRI, and CT. PET/CT has the lowest confidence level, which may limit its use in the clinical setting.