Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2009
[Results of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of indeterminate solid renal tumours].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li G, Cuilleron M, Cottier M, Rambaud B, Tostain J, Gigante M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of imaging indeterminate solid renal tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2003 to February 2009, 60 cytoaspirations have been performed to 20 female and 40 male patients (average age: 62.0+/-14.2 years) with an indeterminate solid renal mass by imaging. The average tumour size was 3.4+/-2.8 cm. The cytoaspiration was performed through a 22 Gauge needle under CT (n=39) or US (n=21) guidance. Papanicolaou staining was used. All slides were examined by one experienced cytologist without any clinicoradiological information. The results were given as malignant, benign, suspect or non significant. A classification of subtypes of renal cancer might be added by the cytologist.
RESULTS: Twenty-one cytoaspirations (35%) were non significant while 39 (65%) showed cells of interest. Among these 39 cellular cytoaspirations, the specificity for malignancy or benignity was 89.7%. The proportion of non-significant samples was the same in tumors lesser than 2 cm (38.4%) as in tumors 2-4 cm (38.8%) (p=1.000, Fisher's exact test). Subtype identification was only reliable for clear cell carcinomas. No complication was observed.
CONCLUSION: The fine-needle aspiration cytology is an auxiliary technique for the diagnosis of indeterminate solid renal tumours. This simple and mini-invasive technique had a high specificity but a low sensitivity in our experience. Fine-needle aspiration is complementary to core biopsy which remains the gold standard of percutaneous sampling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2003 to February 2009, 60 cytoaspirations have been performed to 20 female and 40 male patients (average age: 62.0+/-14.2 years) with an indeterminate solid renal mass by imaging. The average tumour size was 3.4+/-2.8 cm. The cytoaspiration was performed through a 22 Gauge needle under CT (n=39) or US (n=21) guidance. Papanicolaou staining was used. All slides were examined by one experienced cytologist without any clinicoradiological information. The results were given as malignant, benign, suspect or non significant. A classification of subtypes of renal cancer might be added by the cytologist.
RESULTS: Twenty-one cytoaspirations (35%) were non significant while 39 (65%) showed cells of interest. Among these 39 cellular cytoaspirations, the specificity for malignancy or benignity was 89.7%. The proportion of non-significant samples was the same in tumors lesser than 2 cm (38.4%) as in tumors 2-4 cm (38.8%) (p=1.000, Fisher's exact test). Subtype identification was only reliable for clear cell carcinomas. No complication was observed.
CONCLUSION: The fine-needle aspiration cytology is an auxiliary technique for the diagnosis of indeterminate solid renal tumours. This simple and mini-invasive technique had a high specificity but a low sensitivity in our experience. Fine-needle aspiration is complementary to core biopsy which remains the gold standard of percutaneous sampling.