DOI 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.047
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery in a Chinese Population.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) following acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery.
DESIGN
A retrospective single-center study.
SETTING
Beijing Anzhen Hospital (November 2018 to October 2023).
PARTICIPANTS
1350 patients with ATAAD.
INTERVENTIONS: Predictive models have been developed using various ML algorithms to estimate the risk of postoperative AKI.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
Patients were randomly divided into training (85%) and testing (15%) sets. Seven ML algorithms-Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), LightGBM, Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Logistic Regression (LR)-were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. A web-based application was developed using the optimal model. Postoperative AKI occurred in 586 patients (43.4%). The constructed models-GBM, LightGBM, RF, KNN, MLP-NN, NB, and LR-achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.849 (95% CI 0.798-0.902), 0.874 (95% CI 0.831-0.918), 0.800 (95% CI 0.737-0.855), 0.672 (95% CI 0.598-0.739), 0.529 (95% CI 0.486-0.574), 0.833 (95% CI 0.775-0.886), and 0.866 (95% CI 0.810-0.912), respectively, in the testing set. Among these, the LightGBM model surpassed others in predictive accuracy, calibration, and clinical utility.
CONCLUSION
ML models, particularly LightGBM, accurately predict postoperative AKI risk in ATAAD patients, offering a promising tool to enhance perioperative management and patient outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.