Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess qualitative corneal changes and penetration of pulsed and continuous light accelerated crosslinking by in vivo confocal microscopy and corneal OCT.
METHODS
A total of 20 patients affected from progressive keratoconus were enrolled in the study. Ten eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off pulsed-light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (PL-ACXL) by the KXL UV-A source (Avedro Inc.) with 8 min (1 s on/1 s off) of UV-A exposure at 30 mW/cm(2) and energy dose of 7.2 J/cm(2); 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off continuous-light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CL-ACXL) at 30 mW/cm(2) for 4 min. Riboflavin 0.1% dextran-free plus hydroxyl-propyl-methylcellulose solution (VibeX Rapid, Avedro Inc.) was used for a 10-min corneal soaking. Treated eyes were examined by in vivo scanning laser confocal analysis and spectral anterior segment OCT at 1, 3, and 6 months.
RESULTS
Epithelial stratification and nerves regeneration improved in time, being complete at month 6 in both groups without endothelial damage. Keratocyte apoptosis in PL-ACXL was estimated at a mean depth of ∼200 μm, whereas an uneven demarcation line was detectable by confocal microscopy at a mean depth of 160 μm in CL-ACXL.
CONCLUSION
In vivo confocal microscopy and corneal OCT allowed a precise qualitative analysis of the cornea after epithelium-off PL-ACXL and CL-ACXL treatments. Apoptotic effect was higher in pulsed than in continuous light treatments, exceeding 200 μm in corneal stroma. According to different morphological data, the clinical efficacy of ACXL needs to be determined in a long-term follow-up and large cohort of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.