Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
Patients' preferences and perceptions of point-of-care technologies: Survey results from the lung disease community.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ofosuhene Bernard, Tatere Heaven, Tatere Miraf Yeshaneh, Orwig Taylor, Wang Ziyue, Soni Apurv, Lilly Craig M, Anders Stephen, Dunlap Denise, Lin Honghuang, Walkey Allan, Ghezzi Chiara, Picard Mary Ann, Ayyaswami Varun, Buchholz Bryan, McManus David D, Hafer Nathaniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care technology (POCT) has expanded rapidly, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, less is known about which POCT applications and features patients and caregivers prioritize for lung disease management.
METHODS: We refined a patient-facing survey based on feedback from an online focus group recruited through community and advocacy volunteer networks. The survey was then administered via ResearchMatch to uncompensated U.S. volunteers, who indicated interest in lung disease research (April 1 to May 14, 2025; 6,333 invitations). POCT perceptions were measured via a 10-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: We received 214 responses (3.4% response rate). Respondents were predominantly patients (79%), female (71%), and older than 60 years (59%). Mean ratings suggested strong perceived benefits across nine POCT benefits and low concern across most drawbacks. The greatest concern was insurance coverage for POCT-associated costs (mean score: 6.7/10). Obstructive lung conditions were most frequently prioritized for future POCT applications.
CONCLUSION: Among a national sample of ResearchMatch volunteers affected by lung disease, interest in POCT was high, and insurance coverage remained the most salient concern. By describing preferences and concerns of patients, this study informs future design, regulatory approval, and clinical integration. These findings provide evidence for POCT developers, clinicians, and policymakers focused on improving patient-centered care.
METHODS: We refined a patient-facing survey based on feedback from an online focus group recruited through community and advocacy volunteer networks. The survey was then administered via ResearchMatch to uncompensated U.S. volunteers, who indicated interest in lung disease research (April 1 to May 14, 2025; 6,333 invitations). POCT perceptions were measured via a 10-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: We received 214 responses (3.4% response rate). Respondents were predominantly patients (79%), female (71%), and older than 60 years (59%). Mean ratings suggested strong perceived benefits across nine POCT benefits and low concern across most drawbacks. The greatest concern was insurance coverage for POCT-associated costs (mean score: 6.7/10). Obstructive lung conditions were most frequently prioritized for future POCT applications.
CONCLUSION: Among a national sample of ResearchMatch volunteers affected by lung disease, interest in POCT was high, and insurance coverage remained the most salient concern. By describing preferences and concerns of patients, this study informs future design, regulatory approval, and clinical integration. These findings provide evidence for POCT developers, clinicians, and policymakers focused on improving patient-centered care.