The British journal of ophthalmology · 2014
Optical quality assessment in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a double-pass system: a comparison and variability study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Cong, Ng Paul Ka-Fai, Jhanji Vishal
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To comparatively evaluate the image quality in normal and forme fruste keratoconus patients using a double-pass system.
METHODS: Fourteen normal eyes and 15 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus were included. Corneal tomographic parameters were obtained with optical coherence tomography. Image quality characteristics were determined by an optical quality analysis system (OQAS). Two readings were obtained from each eye. The following parameters were analysed: modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF), Strehl ratio and OQAS values (OV) at contrasts of 100% (OV-100), 20% (OV-20) and 9% (OV-9). Repeatability coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in central corneal thickness, anterior best-fit sphere and posterior best-fit sphere in both groups. There was a significant difference between the mean MTF (p=0.001), Strehl ratio (p<0.001), OV-100 (p=0.001), OV-20 (p<0.001) and OV-9 (p<0.001) values between both groups. The coefficients of variation were 4.10 (MTF) and 13.77 (Strehl ratio) in normal eyes and 14.53 (MTF) and 14.97 (Strehl ratio) in eyes with forme fruste keratoconus. The ICC values were 0.99 and 0.95 for MTF and, 0.80 and 0.91 for Strehl ratio, in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes, respectively. The corresponding repeatability values were 3.53 and 6.15 for MTF and, 0.06 and 0.04 for Strehl ratio, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: OQAS has the potential to be a useful diagnostic tool in cases with early keratoconus. The repeatability of a double-pass (DP) system was good in normal as well as forme fruste keratoconus eyes.
METHODS: Fourteen normal eyes and 15 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus were included. Corneal tomographic parameters were obtained with optical coherence tomography. Image quality characteristics were determined by an optical quality analysis system (OQAS). Two readings were obtained from each eye. The following parameters were analysed: modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF), Strehl ratio and OQAS values (OV) at contrasts of 100% (OV-100), 20% (OV-20) and 9% (OV-9). Repeatability coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in central corneal thickness, anterior best-fit sphere and posterior best-fit sphere in both groups. There was a significant difference between the mean MTF (p=0.001), Strehl ratio (p<0.001), OV-100 (p=0.001), OV-20 (p<0.001) and OV-9 (p<0.001) values between both groups. The coefficients of variation were 4.10 (MTF) and 13.77 (Strehl ratio) in normal eyes and 14.53 (MTF) and 14.97 (Strehl ratio) in eyes with forme fruste keratoconus. The ICC values were 0.99 and 0.95 for MTF and, 0.80 and 0.91 for Strehl ratio, in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes, respectively. The corresponding repeatability values were 3.53 and 6.15 for MTF and, 0.06 and 0.04 for Strehl ratio, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: OQAS has the potential to be a useful diagnostic tool in cases with early keratoconus. The repeatability of a double-pass (DP) system was good in normal as well as forme fruste keratoconus eyes.