Cornea · 2014
Outcome of "mushroom" pattern femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Levinger Eliya, Trivizki Omer, Levinger Shmuel, Kremer Israel
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of "mushroom" femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (M-FLEK) with those of conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in eyes with keratoconus. The femtosecond laser-enabled "mushroom" pattern keratoplasty technique results in less postoperative astigmatism and higher endothelial cell counts compared with conventional PKP in patients with keratoconus.
METHODS: This was a nonrandomized retrospective, single private center clinical study. Between March 2010 and April 2012, 26 eyes underwent M-FLEK and 33 eyes underwent conventional PKP. Data on preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell counts, vector analysis, and complications were retrieved and analyzed.
RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, the mean logMAR BCVA was 0.31 ± 0.55 in the M-FLEK group and 0.32 ± 0.21 in the PKP group (P = 0.91). The mean spherical equivalent was similar between the groups. The mean manifest cylinder was significantly lower in the M-FLEK group (-2.84 ± 1.08 diopters) than in the PKP group (-3.93 ± 2.26 diopters; P = 0.03). There was a smaller mean endothelial cell loss in the M-FLEK group compared with the PKP group (32.1% vs 38.7%, respectively, P = 0.17) 1 year postoperatively. The complication rates were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: M-FLEK appears to be a safe procedure that results in less astigmatism and a trend toward higher endothelial cell counts compared with conventional PKP, with similar postoperative BCVA.
METHODS: This was a nonrandomized retrospective, single private center clinical study. Between March 2010 and April 2012, 26 eyes underwent M-FLEK and 33 eyes underwent conventional PKP. Data on preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell counts, vector analysis, and complications were retrieved and analyzed.
RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, the mean logMAR BCVA was 0.31 ± 0.55 in the M-FLEK group and 0.32 ± 0.21 in the PKP group (P = 0.91). The mean spherical equivalent was similar between the groups. The mean manifest cylinder was significantly lower in the M-FLEK group (-2.84 ± 1.08 diopters) than in the PKP group (-3.93 ± 2.26 diopters; P = 0.03). There was a smaller mean endothelial cell loss in the M-FLEK group compared with the PKP group (32.1% vs 38.7%, respectively, P = 0.17) 1 year postoperatively. The complication rates were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: M-FLEK appears to be a safe procedure that results in less astigmatism and a trend toward higher endothelial cell counts compared with conventional PKP, with similar postoperative BCVA.