Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
A randomized pilot trial of brief family-involved treatment for alcohol use disorder: Treatment engagement and outcomes.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McCrady Barbara S, Tonigan J Scott, Fink Brandi C, Chávez Roberta, Martinez Amber D, Borders Adrienne, Fokas Kathryn, Epstein Elizabeth E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Involving family members in a patient's treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) leads to more positive outcomes, but evidence-based family-involved treatments have not been adopted widely in AUD treatment programs. Study aims the following: (a) modify an empirically supported 12-session AUD treatment, alcohol behavioral couple therapy (ABCT) to make it shorter and appropriate for any concerned family member and (b) conduct a small clinical trial to obtain feasibility data and effect size estimates of treatment efficacy.
METHOD: ABCT content was adapted to three-sessions following input from clinicians, patients, and family members. Patient and family member dyads were recruited from an inpatient treatment program and randomized to the new treatment, brief family-involved treatment (B-FIT), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Drinking was assessed using the Form-90; family support and family functioning were assessed using the Family Environment Scale Conflict and Cohesion subscales and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV, Communication scale. Dyads (n = 35) were assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up.
RESULTS: On average, dyads received one of three B-FIT sessions with 6 dyads receiving no sessions due to scheduling conflicts or patient discharge. At follow-up, there was a large-to-medium effect size estimate favoring B-FIT for proportion drinking days (patient report, n = 22; Hedges' g = 1.01; patient or family report, n = 28; Hedges' g = .48). Results for family support or family functioning measures favored TAU.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of brief family-involved treatment in inpatient AUD treatment was challenging, but preliminary data suggest the potential value of B-FIT in impacting drinking outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
METHOD: ABCT content was adapted to three-sessions following input from clinicians, patients, and family members. Patient and family member dyads were recruited from an inpatient treatment program and randomized to the new treatment, brief family-involved treatment (B-FIT), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Drinking was assessed using the Form-90; family support and family functioning were assessed using the Family Environment Scale Conflict and Cohesion subscales and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV, Communication scale. Dyads (n = 35) were assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up.
RESULTS: On average, dyads received one of three B-FIT sessions with 6 dyads receiving no sessions due to scheduling conflicts or patient discharge. At follow-up, there was a large-to-medium effect size estimate favoring B-FIT for proportion drinking days (patient report, n = 22; Hedges' g = 1.01; patient or family report, n = 28; Hedges' g = .48). Results for family support or family functioning measures favored TAU.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of brief family-involved treatment in inpatient AUD treatment was challenging, but preliminary data suggest the potential value of B-FIT in impacting drinking outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).