Japanese journal of radiology · 2012
Intrahepatic periportal high intensity on hepatobiliary phase images of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: imaging findings and prevalence in various hepatobiliary diseases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kobayashi Satoshi, Matsui Osamu, Gabata Toshifumi, Koda Wataru, Minami Tetsuya, Kozaka Kazuto, Kitao Azusa, Yoneda Norihide, Yoshida Kotaro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To reveal the incidence and degree of intrahepatic periportal high intensity (PHI) on hepatobiliary phase images of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in patients with or without various hepatobiliary diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with normal liver (N = 256) and those with hepatic disorder (N = 857) who underwent EOB-MRI were the subjects in this study. Incidence of PHI was evaluated among the patients with normal liver and those with hepatic disorder. Degree of PHI was categorized into four grades and compared among the various hepatic diseases. Enhancement ratios (ER) of the PHI area, background liver with PHI, and background liver in control cases without PHI were evaluated.
RESULTS: PHI was observed in 2.7 % of the patients with hepatic disorder. No PHI was observed in the patients with normal liver. The incidence rates of PHI among various hepatobiliary diseases were as follows; liver cirrhosis 3.1 %, chronic hepatitis 1.0 %, primary biliary cirrhosis 12.5 %, idiopathic portal hypertension 33.3 %. The ER of the PHI area and background liver were 3.92 and 2.48 (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences between the ER of the PHI area and the ER of background liver in the noncirrhotic control without PHI.
CONCLUSION: In 2.7 % of the patients with a hepatic disorder, the periportal area was saved from decrease of EOB uptake and it showed PHI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with normal liver (N = 256) and those with hepatic disorder (N = 857) who underwent EOB-MRI were the subjects in this study. Incidence of PHI was evaluated among the patients with normal liver and those with hepatic disorder. Degree of PHI was categorized into four grades and compared among the various hepatic diseases. Enhancement ratios (ER) of the PHI area, background liver with PHI, and background liver in control cases without PHI were evaluated.
RESULTS: PHI was observed in 2.7 % of the patients with hepatic disorder. No PHI was observed in the patients with normal liver. The incidence rates of PHI among various hepatobiliary diseases were as follows; liver cirrhosis 3.1 %, chronic hepatitis 1.0 %, primary biliary cirrhosis 12.5 %, idiopathic portal hypertension 33.3 %. The ER of the PHI area and background liver were 3.92 and 2.48 (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences between the ER of the PHI area and the ER of background liver in the noncirrhotic control without PHI.
CONCLUSION: In 2.7 % of the patients with a hepatic disorder, the periportal area was saved from decrease of EOB uptake and it showed PHI.