Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2012
Diagnostic and clinical utility of antibodies against the nuclear body promyelocytic leukaemia and Sp100 antigens in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mytilinaiou Maria G, Meyer Wolfgang, Scheper Thomas, Rigopoulou Eirini I, Probst Christian, Koutsoumpas Andreas L, Abeles Daniel, Burroughs Andrew K, Komorowski Lars, Vergani Diego, Bogdanos Dimitrios P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The lack of an immunoassay that detects antibodies to promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) protein, the primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)-specific multiple nuclear dot (MND) antigen, has prompted us to develop a line immunoassay (LIA) for the simultaneous detection of PML and Sp100 MND-specific autoantibodies.
METHODS: PML and Sp100 were expressed in Escherichia coli, and analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using a monoclonal antibody and MALDI-ToF fingerprinting. A quantitative PML and Sp100 LIA were developed and testing was performed in 150 anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) positive, 20 AMA-PBCs and 130 controls.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (23%) of 150 AMA+ PBCs (18 anti-MND+) were anti-PML+ (12%) or anti-Sp100+ (20%), 10 being anti-PML+/Sp100+, 5 single anti-PML+ and 20 single anti-Sp100+. Six (30%, 5 anti-MND+) AMA-PBCs were anti-PML+ or Sp100+. Only 2 (1.7%) pathological controls were anti-PML+ and/or anti-Sp100+. Levels of anti-PML correlated with those of anti-Sp100 (R=0.64, p<0.0001). The autoantibody profile largely remained unchanged over a 10year-follow up (52 patients, 352 samples). Anti-PML, Sp100 or MND-reactive PBCs were younger and had longer disease duration than the seronegative (p=0.06, for both). Anti-Sp100 levels correlated with the Mayo risk score (r=0.63, p=0.01). Anti-PML+/Sp100+ patients had more advanced disease compared to patients negative for anti-PML/Sp100 (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The new line immunoassay offers a robust and accurate method for the detection of clinically-relevant PBC-specific anti-MND antibodies.
METHODS: PML and Sp100 were expressed in Escherichia coli, and analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using a monoclonal antibody and MALDI-ToF fingerprinting. A quantitative PML and Sp100 LIA were developed and testing was performed in 150 anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) positive, 20 AMA-PBCs and 130 controls.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (23%) of 150 AMA+ PBCs (18 anti-MND+) were anti-PML+ (12%) or anti-Sp100+ (20%), 10 being anti-PML+/Sp100+, 5 single anti-PML+ and 20 single anti-Sp100+. Six (30%, 5 anti-MND+) AMA-PBCs were anti-PML+ or Sp100+. Only 2 (1.7%) pathological controls were anti-PML+ and/or anti-Sp100+. Levels of anti-PML correlated with those of anti-Sp100 (R=0.64, p<0.0001). The autoantibody profile largely remained unchanged over a 10year-follow up (52 patients, 352 samples). Anti-PML, Sp100 or MND-reactive PBCs were younger and had longer disease duration than the seronegative (p=0.06, for both). Anti-Sp100 levels correlated with the Mayo risk score (r=0.63, p=0.01). Anti-PML+/Sp100+ patients had more advanced disease compared to patients negative for anti-PML/Sp100 (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The new line immunoassay offers a robust and accurate method for the detection of clinically-relevant PBC-specific anti-MND antibodies.