International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2019
Randomized controlled trial of orchid drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liao Chuan-Jun, Song Sheng-Han, Li Tan, Zhang Yang, Zhang Wang-de
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of Orchid drug-coated balloon (DCB) for treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) in Chinese patients.
METHODS: The study is a prospective, single center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that randomized (1:1) 74 patients to DCB group (N.=38) and PTA group (N.=36). The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency of the target lesion at 12 months. Second efficacy endpoint included clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and ABI change at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint included peri-operative death at 30 days, all-cause death, major amputation, and other major adverse events (MAEs) at 12 months. The primary functional endpoint included Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), quality-of-life measures (EQ-5D) and 6-minute walking test (6MWT).
RESULTS: The DCB group had higher primary patency (87.9% vs. 51.6%; P=0.001) and lower rates of CD-TLR (6.1% vs. 35.5%; P=0.003) than the PTA group at 12 months. There were no peri-operative deaths, and no major amputations at 12 months in two groups. There were 1(2.6%) in the DCB group and 2 (5.6%) in the PTA group of all-cause deaths (P=0.524).
CONCLUSIONS: Results from the study showed superior treatment effect with Orchid DCB versus PTA for the treatment of FP ISR, and without an apparent difference in safety.
METHODS: The study is a prospective, single center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that randomized (1:1) 74 patients to DCB group (N.=38) and PTA group (N.=36). The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency of the target lesion at 12 months. Second efficacy endpoint included clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and ABI change at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint included peri-operative death at 30 days, all-cause death, major amputation, and other major adverse events (MAEs) at 12 months. The primary functional endpoint included Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), quality-of-life measures (EQ-5D) and 6-minute walking test (6MWT).
RESULTS: The DCB group had higher primary patency (87.9% vs. 51.6%; P=0.001) and lower rates of CD-TLR (6.1% vs. 35.5%; P=0.003) than the PTA group at 12 months. There were no peri-operative deaths, and no major amputations at 12 months in two groups. There were 1(2.6%) in the DCB group and 2 (5.6%) in the PTA group of all-cause deaths (P=0.524).
CONCLUSIONS: Results from the study showed superior treatment effect with Orchid DCB versus PTA for the treatment of FP ISR, and without an apparent difference in safety.