European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2009
An approach to sub-grouping the eating disorder population: adding attachment and coping style.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turner Hannah, Bryant-Waugh Rachel, Peveler Robert
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether clinically meaningful sub-groups of patients can be identified by clustering eating disorder features, attachment and coping styles.
METHOD: 165 patients completed the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE), Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ) and Utrecht Coping List (UCL). Cluster analysis was used to identify sub-groups across the sample.
RESULTS: Four clusters were identified. Cluster one had low levels of eating disorder behaviours and the most severe attachment and coping difficulties. Cluster two had high levels of dietary restriction and exercise, and a fearful/avoidant attachment style. Cluster three had high levels of binge eating and vomiting, and few attachment and coping difficulties. Cluster four had low levels of eating disorder features and positive attachment and coping styles.
CONCLUSIONS: Clustering participants on the basis of eating disorder features, attachment and coping yields four sub-groups appearing to have clinical face validity.
METHOD: 165 patients completed the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE), Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ) and Utrecht Coping List (UCL). Cluster analysis was used to identify sub-groups across the sample.
RESULTS: Four clusters were identified. Cluster one had low levels of eating disorder behaviours and the most severe attachment and coping difficulties. Cluster two had high levels of dietary restriction and exercise, and a fearful/avoidant attachment style. Cluster three had high levels of binge eating and vomiting, and few attachment and coping difficulties. Cluster four had low levels of eating disorder features and positive attachment and coping styles.
CONCLUSIONS: Clustering participants on the basis of eating disorder features, attachment and coping yields four sub-groups appearing to have clinical face validity.