DOI 10.1097/ico.0b013e318242fd0f
Comparative study of central corneal thickness using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) results measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) in glaucomatous eyes.
METHODS
In this prospective, observational cross-sectional study, 80 eyes of 80 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and no other ocular abnormality were selected: 28 were treated with 1 drug (subgroup 1), 32 with 2 drugs (subgroup 2), and 20 with 3 drugs (subgroup 3). CCT was measured by FD-OCT (RTVue OCT) and USP (Pachymeter Reichert IOPac). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between both instruments. The differences between CCTs measured by USP and FD-OCT were compared among the 3 subgroups.
RESULTS
The mean CCT was 537.76 ± 32.24 μm and 520.53 ± 30.44 μm for USP and FD-OCT, respectively. A significant difference was found between the mean values obtained by FD-OCT and USP (17.22 ± 7.96 μm, P < 0.001, paired Student t test). A high correlation was obtained for CCT measured by both methods (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.969; P < 0.001), and there was good agreement between the 2 pachymetry methods. Similar differences in CCT using USP and FD-OCT were found among the 3 treatment subgroups (P > 0.05 in all pairwise comparisons, analysis of variance).
CONCLUSIONS
FD-OCT underestimates CCT compared with CCT measured by USP in POAG. Although highly correlated, the difference between these 2 devices can be clinically significant in the context of refractive surgeries in POAG patients but not in intraocular pressure estimation. This difference also seems to be independent of the number of antiglaucoma treatments used.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.