Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
Periprocedural Assessment of Coronary Microcirculatory Function to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li ChenGuang, Zhou You, Lu Danbo, Ma Jiaqi, Dai Chunfeng, Ma Jianying, Hu Yumeng, Xu Jianyi, Xiang Jianping, Chen Zhangwei, Qian Juying, Ge Junbo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could restore epicardial blood flow through the stent-based angioplasty. However, coronary microcirculatory function also affects clinical outcomes and can be quantified by the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR). The prognostic significance of periprocedural angio-IMR in patients undergoing elective PCI remains unclear. This study aimed to assess angio-IMR before and after PCI, as well as their association with long-term prognosis.
METHODS: Data from 1768 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI were analyzed. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising death and nonfatal myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: The median angio-IMR was 11.3 (interquartile range, 7.7-15.0) and 17.0 (interquartile range, 14.1-20.4) before and after PCI (P<0.001), respectively. During a median follow-up period of 20 months, MACE occurred in 53 patients (3.0%). Periprocedural angio-IMR changes (Δangio-IMR) exhibited superior predictive power for MACE compared with post-PCI angio-IMR alone. Specifically, Δangio-IMR>10 was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.32-4.49]; P=0.004). In comparison with periprocedural myocardial infarction, Δangio-IMR>10 could provide additional prognostic value in predicting MACE (area under the curve, 0.681 versus 0.635, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Δangio-IMR was a predictor of MACE in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI. Incorporating Δangio-IMR could enhance the identification of patients at high risk of MACE.
METHODS: Data from 1768 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI were analyzed. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising death and nonfatal myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: The median angio-IMR was 11.3 (interquartile range, 7.7-15.0) and 17.0 (interquartile range, 14.1-20.4) before and after PCI (P<0.001), respectively. During a median follow-up period of 20 months, MACE occurred in 53 patients (3.0%). Periprocedural angio-IMR changes (Δangio-IMR) exhibited superior predictive power for MACE compared with post-PCI angio-IMR alone. Specifically, Δangio-IMR>10 was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.32-4.49]; P=0.004). In comparison with periprocedural myocardial infarction, Δangio-IMR>10 could provide additional prognostic value in predicting MACE (area under the curve, 0.681 versus 0.635, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Δangio-IMR was a predictor of MACE in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI. Incorporating Δangio-IMR could enhance the identification of patients at high risk of MACE.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionFemaleMaleMicrocirculationCoronary Artery DiseaseMiddle AgedAgedCoronary CirculationCoronary AngiographyTreatment OutcomeVascular ResistancePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsCoronary VesselsRisk AssessmentMyocardial InfarctionElective Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsPrognosis