MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/2325957414555233

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care · 2014

Case report: false negative serum cryptococcal latex agglutination test in a patient with disseminated cryptococcal disease.

Navabi Nazlee, Montebatsi Milton, Scott Michelle, Gluckman Stephen J, Reid Michael J A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A case of false-negative serum latex agglutination cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) test in a 45-year-old HIV-positive male with Cryptococcus-positive culture is described. The patient was presented to a hospital in Botswana, with breathlessness and a diffuse papular rash. His CD4 count was 25 cells/μL. Despite the suspicion for disseminated cryptococcal disease, an initial serum CRAG latex test was negative. Results of subsequent Indian ink staining, culture of cerebrospinal fluid and skin scrapings, and serum lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) were all positive for Cryptococcus neoformans. There are several possible explanations for the false-negative CRAG latex test. Given the positive LFA result, we speculate that disease may have been caused by Cryptococcus gattii, which is estimated to be responsible for between 15% and 30% of all cryptococcal diseases in Botswana. Reduced sensitivity of CRAG latex assays for detecting C gattii may lead to underdiagnosis of cryptococcal infection.

Для цитирования: Navabi Nazlee, Montebatsi Milton, Scott Michelle, Gluckman Stephen J, Reid Michael J A. Case report: false negative serum cryptococcal latex agglutination test in a patient with disseminated cryptococcal disease.. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/2325957414555233.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.