Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2020
An Alzheimer Disease Challenge Model: 24-Hour Sleep Deprivation in Healthy Volunteers, Impact on Working Memory, and Reversal Effect of Pharmacological Intervention: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Kwong Anna, Cassé-Perrot Catherine, Costes-Salon Marie-Claude, Jouve Elisabeth, Lanteaume Laura, Audebert Christine, Rouby Franck, Lefebvre Marie-Noëlle, Ranjeva Jean-Philippe, Beck Arnaud, Deplanque Dominique, Ponchel Amélie, Vervueren Céline, Truillet Romain, Babilon Claudio, Auffret Alexandra, Richardson Jill C, Payoux Pierre, Bartrés-Faz David, Blin Olivier, Bordet Régis, Micallef Joëlle, Pharmacog Consortium
Аннотация
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a public health issue because of the low number of symptomatic drugs and the difficulty to diagnose it at the prodromal stage. The need to develop new treatments and to validate sensitive tests for early diagnosis could be met by developing a challenge model reproducing cognitive impairments of AD. Therefore, we implemented a 24-hour sleep deprivation (SD) design on healthy volunteers in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study on 36 healthy volunteers.
METHODS/PROCEDURE: To validate the SD model, cognitive tests were chosen to assess a transient worsening of cognitive functions after SD and a restoration under modafinil as positive control (one dose of 200 mg). Then, the same evaluations were replicated after 15 days of donepezil (5 mg/d) or memantine (10 mg/d). The working memory (WM) function was assessed by the N-back task and the rapid visual processing (RVP) task.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: The accuracy of the N-back task and the reaction time of the RVP revealed the alteration of the WM with SD and its restoration with modafinil (changes in score after SD compared with baseline before SD), respectively, in the placebo group and in the modafinil group (-0.2% and +1.0% of satisfactory answers, P = 0.022; +21.3 and +1.9 milliseconds of reaction time, P = 0.025). Alzheimer disease drugs also tended to reverse this deterioration: the accuracy of the N-back task was more stable through SD (compared with -3.0% in the placebo group, respectively, in the memantine group and in the donepezil group: -1.4% and -1.6%, P = 0.027 and P = 0.092) and RVP reaction time was less impacted (compared with +41.3 milliseconds in the placebo group, respectively, in the memantine group and in the donepezil group: +16.1 and +29.3 milliseconds, P = 0.034 and P = 0.459).
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our SD challenge model actually led to a worsening of WM that was moderated by both modafinil and AD drugs. To use this approach, the cognitive battery, the vulnerability of the subjects to SD, and the expected drug effect should be carefully considered.
METHODS/PROCEDURE: To validate the SD model, cognitive tests were chosen to assess a transient worsening of cognitive functions after SD and a restoration under modafinil as positive control (one dose of 200 mg). Then, the same evaluations were replicated after 15 days of donepezil (5 mg/d) or memantine (10 mg/d). The working memory (WM) function was assessed by the N-back task and the rapid visual processing (RVP) task.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: The accuracy of the N-back task and the reaction time of the RVP revealed the alteration of the WM with SD and its restoration with modafinil (changes in score after SD compared with baseline before SD), respectively, in the placebo group and in the modafinil group (-0.2% and +1.0% of satisfactory answers, P = 0.022; +21.3 and +1.9 milliseconds of reaction time, P = 0.025). Alzheimer disease drugs also tended to reverse this deterioration: the accuracy of the N-back task was more stable through SD (compared with -3.0% in the placebo group, respectively, in the memantine group and in the donepezil group: -1.4% and -1.6%, P = 0.027 and P = 0.092) and RVP reaction time was less impacted (compared with +41.3 milliseconds in the placebo group, respectively, in the memantine group and in the donepezil group: +16.1 and +29.3 milliseconds, P = 0.034 and P = 0.459).
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our SD challenge model actually led to a worsening of WM that was moderated by both modafinil and AD drugs. To use this approach, the cognitive battery, the vulnerability of the subjects to SD, and the expected drug effect should be carefully considered.