HIV research & clinical practice · 2020
Pooled resistance analyses of darunavir once-daily regimens and formulations across 10 clinical studies of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lathouwers Erkki, Seyedkazemi Sareh, Luo Donghan, Brown Kimberley, De Meyer Sandra, Wong Eric Y
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and high barrier to resistance of darunavir have been demonstrated across diverse populations with HIV-1 infection.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate post-baseline resistance among patients in studies of once-daily (QD) darunavir-based regimens and formulations.
METHODS: The analysis included treatment-naïve and virologically failing or suppressed patients from 10 phase 2/3 studies (48-192 weeks in duration) of boosted darunavir 800 mg QD-based regimens. Three were phase 3 studies of the QD darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg single-tablet regimen. Post-baseline resistance was evaluated upon protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF). Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were identified using International Antiviral Society-USA mutation lists. Phenotypic analyses varied across studies.
RESULTS: Overall, 250 of 3635 patients in the analysis met PDVF criteria; 205 had post-baseline genotypes/phenotypes. In total, four (0.1%) patients developed (or had identified) ≥1 darunavir and/or primary protease inhibitor (PI) RAM; only one (<0.1%) patient (with prior lopinavir virologic failure) lost darunavir phenotypic susceptibility. Among 3317 patients using nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N[t]RTIs; mostly emtricitabine and tenofovir), 13 (0.4%) had ≥1 N(t)RTI RAM (10 with M184I/V). Among patients receiving D/C/F/TAF (n = 1949), none had post-baseline darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir RAMs; only two (0.1%) patients developed an emtricitabine RAM, M184V/I.
CONCLUSIONS: Across a large, diverse population using darunavir 800 mg QD-based regimens and formulations, resistance development remains rare. After clinical trials that span >10 years, loss of phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir was only observed once in a PI-experienced patient and has never been observed in treatment-naïve patients, treatment-experienced PI-naïve patients, or treatment-experienced virologically suppressed patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate post-baseline resistance among patients in studies of once-daily (QD) darunavir-based regimens and formulations.
METHODS: The analysis included treatment-naïve and virologically failing or suppressed patients from 10 phase 2/3 studies (48-192 weeks in duration) of boosted darunavir 800 mg QD-based regimens. Three were phase 3 studies of the QD darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg single-tablet regimen. Post-baseline resistance was evaluated upon protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF). Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were identified using International Antiviral Society-USA mutation lists. Phenotypic analyses varied across studies.
RESULTS: Overall, 250 of 3635 patients in the analysis met PDVF criteria; 205 had post-baseline genotypes/phenotypes. In total, four (0.1%) patients developed (or had identified) ≥1 darunavir and/or primary protease inhibitor (PI) RAM; only one (<0.1%) patient (with prior lopinavir virologic failure) lost darunavir phenotypic susceptibility. Among 3317 patients using nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N[t]RTIs; mostly emtricitabine and tenofovir), 13 (0.4%) had ≥1 N(t)RTI RAM (10 with M184I/V). Among patients receiving D/C/F/TAF (n = 1949), none had post-baseline darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir RAMs; only two (0.1%) patients developed an emtricitabine RAM, M184V/I.
CONCLUSIONS: Across a large, diverse population using darunavir 800 mg QD-based regimens and formulations, resistance development remains rare. After clinical trials that span >10 years, loss of phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir was only observed once in a PI-experienced patient and has never been observed in treatment-naïve patients, treatment-experienced PI-naïve patients, or treatment-experienced virologically suppressed patients.