Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of study was to compare the efficiency and safety of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) in lower calyx and/or pelvic stones smaller than three centimeters.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

From October 2010 to August 2015, 108 mPNL and 176 sPNL procedures were performed for renal stones smaller than three cm and located in the lower calyx and/or renal pelvis. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with intravenous pyelography and/or computed tomography. Intraoperative parameters, post-operative results and complications were recorded. Postoperative success was defined as complete stone clearance and/or clinically insignificant residual fragments at 3rd month.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics were similar between sPNL and mPNL groups except previous renal stone operation history and gender. The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the sPNL group (p<0.001). The mean hemoglobin drop was significantly less in the mPNL group (p=0.001), we found a 1.27±1.4 and 0.5±1.3 decrease in mean hemoglobin levels (mg/dL) in the sPNL and mPNL groups, respectively. Transfusion rate was 1.9% in mPNL and 5.6% in sPNL groups, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.048). Only one patient in the sPNL group needed angiography and embolization. Postoperative JJ stent insertion rate was significantly higher in the mPNL group (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Both sPNL and mPNL are safe and effective surgical procedures for lower calyx and/or pelvis stones smaller than 3 cm. However, use of smaller caliber instruments was associated with a lesser hemoglobin drop and need for transfusion.