Turkish journal of urology · 2017
Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?".
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Hamed Ahmed Mamdouh Abd, Elmoghazy Hazem, Aldahshoury Mohamed, Riad Ahmed, Mostafa Mohammed, Farag Fawzy, Gamal Wael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stone hardness in predicting the need for single or two sessions of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal pelvis stones of 2-3 cm in size.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six patients (64 male and 32 female) with only renal stones (2.5±0.3 cm) underwent RIRS using flexible 7.5 Fr ureteroscope (FURS). The stone hardness was evaluated by preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). The patients were divided into two groups based on stone hardness: Group I (n=54) (hard stones - Hounsfield Unit (HU) >1000) and group II (n=42) (not hard stone - HU <1000). The stone-free rate, the operative time, any intra or postoperative complications and the need for second sessions of RIRS were evaluated.
RESULTS: All stones were successfully accessed. Intraoperative complications were not reported. The initial stone-free rate was 40% in Group I and 95% in Group II after a single session (p=0.01). A second session FURS was needed in 32 cases of Group I (40%) where postoperative CT showed significant residual stone fragments of 6±2 mm, and stone-free rate up to 100 percent. On the contrary only 2 cases from Group II underwent second session FURS (p=0.01). The operative times were 75±15 minutes in Group I and 55±13 minutes in Group II (p<0.01). Six patients (4 in group I and 2 in group II) had postoperative high-grade fever (Clavien Grade II).
CONCLUSION: Stone hardness had a significant impact on the decision of performing single versus two sessions of FURS for renal pelvic stones of 2-3 cm rather than the stone size alone.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six patients (64 male and 32 female) with only renal stones (2.5±0.3 cm) underwent RIRS using flexible 7.5 Fr ureteroscope (FURS). The stone hardness was evaluated by preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). The patients were divided into two groups based on stone hardness: Group I (n=54) (hard stones - Hounsfield Unit (HU) >1000) and group II (n=42) (not hard stone - HU <1000). The stone-free rate, the operative time, any intra or postoperative complications and the need for second sessions of RIRS were evaluated.
RESULTS: All stones were successfully accessed. Intraoperative complications were not reported. The initial stone-free rate was 40% in Group I and 95% in Group II after a single session (p=0.01). A second session FURS was needed in 32 cases of Group I (40%) where postoperative CT showed significant residual stone fragments of 6±2 mm, and stone-free rate up to 100 percent. On the contrary only 2 cases from Group II underwent second session FURS (p=0.01). The operative times were 75±15 minutes in Group I and 55±13 minutes in Group II (p<0.01). Six patients (4 in group I and 2 in group II) had postoperative high-grade fever (Clavien Grade II).
CONCLUSION: Stone hardness had a significant impact on the decision of performing single versus two sessions of FURS for renal pelvic stones of 2-3 cm rather than the stone size alone.