DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.20.008
[Clinical characteristics and microsurgical strategy of intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms].
Аннотация
Objective
To explore the clinical characteristics and microsurgical strategies of intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms.
Methods
The clinical manifestations, imaging data, surgical approaches and follow-up results of 35 patients with circulating aneurysms (37 aneurysms) treated by microsurgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2013 to January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
A total of 22 aneurysms were clipped, 13 were clipped and resected, 1 case was clipped and together with AVM resection and 1 case was isolated. Of 37 aneurysms in 35 patients, 11 aneurysms were at the basilar artery apexes, 10 at the posterior cerebral arteries, 6 at the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, 3 at the basilar arteries, 3 at the vertebral arteries (including 1 case of vertebral arterial dissecting aneurysm), 2 at the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries and 2 at the superior cerebellar arteries. The surgical approaches included pterional approach, extensive pterional approach, infratemporal fossa approach, retrosigmoid approach and far-lateral approach. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores showed good recovery in 24 cases, moderate neurological dysfunction in 6 cases, severe neurological dysfunction in 2 cases, persistent vegetative state in 1 case and 2 cases of death 6 months after their discharge from hospital.
Conclusions
Posterior circulation aneurysms are adjacent to important structures. They are deep in position, with small operation space and difficult to operate. Full preoperative evaluation of the condition, selection of appropriate surgical methods are the key factors to benefit the patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.