Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2019
Direct drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the proportional method: A multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amini Sirus, Hoffner Sven, Allahyar Torkaman Mohammad Reza, Hamzehloo Gholamreza, Nasiri Mohammad Javad, Salehi Mahshid, Sami Kashkooli Golnar, Shahraki Mohammad Sadegh, Mohsenpoor Maryam, Soleimanpour Saman, Mir Raha
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Conventional indirect drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with solid media is inexpensive and reliable, but time-consuming. This study aimed to evaluate direct DST for testing sputum samples without culture to significantly reduce the time required to detect multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).
METHODS: Direct and indirect DST of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB) were performed on 334 sputum smear-positive specimens.
RESULTS: There was full agreement between the results obtained from direct testing and after isolation of the bacteria by culture. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were observed to be 100% for all three tested drugs when compared with indirect DST. In comparison with indirect DST, none of the samples with the direct method took >25days to report the DST (between 15-25days with a mean detection time of 20 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct DST on solid media was shown to give reliable results at a much earlier stage than conventional phenotypic DST. The direct method was found to be more rapid, more accurate and simpler. In addition, it reduced the handling of pathogenic bacteria and thus reduced the bio hazards related to conventional DST.
METHODS: Direct and indirect DST of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB) were performed on 334 sputum smear-positive specimens.
RESULTS: There was full agreement between the results obtained from direct testing and after isolation of the bacteria by culture. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were observed to be 100% for all three tested drugs when compared with indirect DST. In comparison with indirect DST, none of the samples with the direct method took >25days to report the DST (between 15-25days with a mean detection time of 20 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct DST on solid media was shown to give reliable results at a much earlier stage than conventional phenotypic DST. The direct method was found to be more rapid, more accurate and simpler. In addition, it reduced the handling of pathogenic bacteria and thus reduced the bio hazards related to conventional DST.