Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993) · 2017
Hemodynamic characterization of hypertensive patients with an exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barochiner Jessica, Aparicio Lucas S, Alfie José, Rada Marcelo A, Morales Margarita S, Galarza Carlos R, Cuffaro Paula E, Marín Marcos J, Martínez Rocío, Waisman Gabriel D
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation (EOV) is a poorly understood phenomenon related to high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to determine whether hypertensive patients with EOV have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, assessed through impedance cardiography.
METHODS: In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between -20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between -10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV.
RESULTS: We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01-1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo.
CONCLUSION: Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.
METHODS: In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between -20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between -10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV.
RESULTS: We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01-1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo.
CONCLUSION: Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.