Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014
Scheimpflug Analysis of Centration and Bending of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tassignon Marie-José B R, Rozema Jos J, Ní Dhubhghaill Sorcha
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to present a novel technique for the assessment of postoperative centration and bending in phakic intraocular lens (PIOL), illustrated through 4 patient examples.
DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study.
METHODS: Four patients (7 eyes) who presented with complaints of reduced quality of vision after implantation with a Staar Collamer plate haptic PIOL were recruited for assessment. Scheimpflug images were obtained and analyzed with respect to the apical axis and the crystalline lens by means of an in-house-developed algorithm. The program provides an estimate for the PIOL centration and bending through an analysis of the distance between the PIOL and the crystalline lens.
RESULTS: The algorithm detected PIOL bending in 5 of the 7 eyes and PIOL decentration in 3 eyes. The PIOL bending or decentration detected corresponded, in all cases, with the axis of the astigmatism-like complaints in the patient. In 2 eyes of the same patient, the analysis could not be performed because the distance between PIOL and crystalline lens was too short for reliable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm is a useful tool to objectively assess the postoperative complaints of patients implanted with a posterior chamber PIOL. Bending and decentration due to anatomical variations of the sulcus lens position can be measured and in many cases correlated with patients' complaints.
DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study.
METHODS: Four patients (7 eyes) who presented with complaints of reduced quality of vision after implantation with a Staar Collamer plate haptic PIOL were recruited for assessment. Scheimpflug images were obtained and analyzed with respect to the apical axis and the crystalline lens by means of an in-house-developed algorithm. The program provides an estimate for the PIOL centration and bending through an analysis of the distance between the PIOL and the crystalline lens.
RESULTS: The algorithm detected PIOL bending in 5 of the 7 eyes and PIOL decentration in 3 eyes. The PIOL bending or decentration detected corresponded, in all cases, with the axis of the astigmatism-like complaints in the patient. In 2 eyes of the same patient, the analysis could not be performed because the distance between PIOL and crystalline lens was too short for reliable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm is a useful tool to objectively assess the postoperative complaints of patients implanted with a posterior chamber PIOL. Bending and decentration due to anatomical variations of the sulcus lens position can be measured and in many cases correlated with patients' complaints.