The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2011
Unsatisfactory surgical learning curve with hip resurfacing.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berend Keith R, Lombardi Adolph V, Adams Joanne B, Sneller Michael A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is considered by many to be a conservative alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty. There are advantages and drawbacks to any procedure, and there is a learning curve associated with the introduction of any new technology. The purpose of this study is to report the complication rate, types of complications, and outcomes of hip resurfacing during the early experience of two high-volume hip surgeons.
METHODS: Seventy-three hip resurfacing procedures were performed in sixty-four patients between September 2006 and March 2009. These procedures represented 6% of all of the primary hip arthroplasty procedures performed by the two surgeons.
RESULTS: After an average duration of follow-up of twenty-five months, there were six revisions--i.e., an early failure rate of 8%. These revisions were performed to treat two deep infections, two femoral neck fractures, one case of femoral implant loosening, and one failure of an acetabular implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of a high early failure rate, we have reduced the utilization of hip resurfacing in our patients who are candidates for hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Seventy-three hip resurfacing procedures were performed in sixty-four patients between September 2006 and March 2009. These procedures represented 6% of all of the primary hip arthroplasty procedures performed by the two surgeons.
RESULTS: After an average duration of follow-up of twenty-five months, there were six revisions--i.e., an early failure rate of 8%. These revisions were performed to treat two deep infections, two femoral neck fractures, one case of femoral implant loosening, and one failure of an acetabular implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of a high early failure rate, we have reduced the utilization of hip resurfacing in our patients who are candidates for hip arthroplasty.