MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdz162

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2020

Applying principles of injury and infectious disease control to the opioid mortality epidemic in North America: critical intervention gaps.

Fischer Benedikt, Pang Michelle, Tyndall Mark

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

North America has been experiencing an acute and unprecedented public health crisis involving excessive and increasing levels of opioid-related overdose mortality. In the present commentary, we examine current interventions (as existent mainly in Canada) to date and compare them against established intervention frameworks and practices in other areas of public health, specifically injury and infectious disease control. We observe that current interventions focusing on opioid drug safety or exposure-specifically those that focus on distinctly potent and toxic opioid products driving major increases in overdose mortality-may be considered the equivalent of 'agent-' or 'vector'-based interventions. Such interventions have been largely neglected in favor of 'host' (e.g., drug user-oriented) or 'environmental' measures among strategies to reduce opioid-related overdose, likely contributing to the limited efficacy of current measures. We explore potential reasons, implications and remedies for these gaps in the overall public health strategy employed towards improved interventions to reduce opioid-related health harms.

Для цитирования: Fischer Benedikt, Pang Michelle, Tyndall Mark. Applying principles of injury and infectious disease control to the opioid mortality epidemic in North America: critical intervention gaps.. Journal of public health (Oxford, England). 2020. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz162.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.