Blood purification · 2005
Does bicarbonate transfer have relevant hemodynamic consequences in standard hemodialysis?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gabutti Luca, Ross Vanessa, Duchini Francesca, Mombelli Giorgio, Marone Claudio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In a previous study we demonstrated that mild metabolic alkalosis resulting from standard bicarbonate hemodialysis induces hypotension. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic consequences of either a decrease in the dialysate bicarbonate from 32 to 26 mmol/l or an increase in the dialysate calcium of 0.25 mmol/l and to verify whether the calcium shift secondary to alkalemia explains the consequences on blood pressure.
METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with a single-blind, cross-over design, we used dialysis liquids with two different bicarbonate (32 mmol/l in modalities A and C, and 26 mmol/l in modality B) and calcium (1.25 mmol/l in modalities A and B, and 1.50 mmol/l in modality C) concentrations, and in 27 patients, 243 dialysis sessions, compared blood pressure, heart rate and the incidence of hypotension.
RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between A and B while an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and a decrease in the incidence of hypotension (10.5 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05) were documented in C. The subgroup of patients who with A showed a lower mean systolic blood pressure received more angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (36 vs. 0%, p<0.05) and in C showed a less important increase in systolic and diastolic pressures, but the incidence of hypotensive episodes between A and B was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 15.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study it was not possible to demonstrate hemo dynamic instability associated with mild metabolic alkalosis. Even in the subgroup showing a lower blood pressure with a higher dialysate bicarbonate, significant hemodynamic or clinical consequences were not noticed. The calcium shift (0.05 mmol/l) related to alkalemia would justify a mean decrease in systolic blood pressure of only about 1 mm Hg.
METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with a single-blind, cross-over design, we used dialysis liquids with two different bicarbonate (32 mmol/l in modalities A and C, and 26 mmol/l in modality B) and calcium (1.25 mmol/l in modalities A and B, and 1.50 mmol/l in modality C) concentrations, and in 27 patients, 243 dialysis sessions, compared blood pressure, heart rate and the incidence of hypotension.
RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between A and B while an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and a decrease in the incidence of hypotension (10.5 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05) were documented in C. The subgroup of patients who with A showed a lower mean systolic blood pressure received more angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (36 vs. 0%, p<0.05) and in C showed a less important increase in systolic and diastolic pressures, but the incidence of hypotensive episodes between A and B was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 15.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study it was not possible to demonstrate hemo dynamic instability associated with mild metabolic alkalosis. Even in the subgroup showing a lower blood pressure with a higher dialysate bicarbonate, significant hemodynamic or clinical consequences were not noticed. The calcium shift (0.05 mmol/l) related to alkalemia would justify a mean decrease in systolic blood pressure of only about 1 mm Hg.