Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2026
Pathological features of residual head and neck cancer after near-infrared photoimmunotherapy: implications of an unfavorable tumor immune microenvironment.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Makino Takuma, Sato Yasuharu, Nishikori Asami, Naoi Yuto, Ando Mizuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy has been approved in Japan for unresectable locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer. While this therapy theoretically induces selective necrosis of epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing tumor cells following administration of cetuximab sarotalocan sodium and irradiation with 690-nm light, residual disease is not uncommon in clinical practice. The mechanisms underlying such persistence remain poorly understood.
METHODS: We examined two patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent salvage resection due to residual disease after four cycles of near-infrared photoimmunotherapy. Resected specimens were subjected to histopathological evaluation, including immunohistochemistry for epidermal growth factor receptor, cluster of differentiation 8, programmed cell death protein 1, and forkhead box P3 proteins.
RESULTS: In both cases, residual tumor cells were predominantly localized in the superficial mucosal layers, while deeper layers were replaced by fibrosis. All residual tumors retained expression of epidermal growth factor receptor. Lymphocytic infiltration was sparse, with scattered cluster of differentiation 8-positive cells but few programmed cell death protein 1-positive or forkhead box P3-positive lymphocytes. These findings suggest that the tumor microenvironment surrounding residual tumors may have been unfavorable for the induction of robust antitumor immune responses.
CONCLUSION: Residual tumors after near-infrared photoimmunotherapy can occur despite adequate laser irradiation and epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Our observations imply that insufficient immune activation within the tumor microenvironment may contribute to treatment resistance. Further characterization of the post-photoimmunotherapy tumor microenvironment will be essential to better understand treatment mechanisms and to optimize therapeutic efficacy.
METHODS: We examined two patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent salvage resection due to residual disease after four cycles of near-infrared photoimmunotherapy. Resected specimens were subjected to histopathological evaluation, including immunohistochemistry for epidermal growth factor receptor, cluster of differentiation 8, programmed cell death protein 1, and forkhead box P3 proteins.
RESULTS: In both cases, residual tumor cells were predominantly localized in the superficial mucosal layers, while deeper layers were replaced by fibrosis. All residual tumors retained expression of epidermal growth factor receptor. Lymphocytic infiltration was sparse, with scattered cluster of differentiation 8-positive cells but few programmed cell death protein 1-positive or forkhead box P3-positive lymphocytes. These findings suggest that the tumor microenvironment surrounding residual tumors may have been unfavorable for the induction of robust antitumor immune responses.
CONCLUSION: Residual tumors after near-infrared photoimmunotherapy can occur despite adequate laser irradiation and epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Our observations imply that insufficient immune activation within the tumor microenvironment may contribute to treatment resistance. Further characterization of the post-photoimmunotherapy tumor microenvironment will be essential to better understand treatment mechanisms and to optimize therapeutic efficacy.