m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Resuscitation · 2025

The apnea interval: Ventilation interruption during tracheal intubation and its association with cardiac arrest resuscitation care and outcome.

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Murphy David L, King Julia A, Blackwood Jennifer, Kwok Heemun, Sharar Sam R, Latimer Andrew J, Kudenchuk Peter J, Johnson Nicholas J, Rea Thomas D

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation recommend advanced airway management without interrupting chest compressions. However, the extent and impact of interrupting ventilation is unknown. We described the apnea interval that occurs during tracheal intubation and its association with clinical outcomes.

METHODS: We conducted a cohort investigation of adult ventricular fibrillation (VF) OHCA patients who underwent attempted tracheal intubation prior to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a metropolitan EMS system (2017-2020). Apnea interval was defined as elapsed time between last breath delivered before and first breath delivered following tracheal intubation attempt. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the relationship between apnea interval (≤60 s vs > 60 s) and outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic survival (CPC 1-2).

RESULTS: Among 254 patients, median age was 65 years, 18% were female, and 98% had tracheal intubation success. Overall, 151 (59%) achieved ROSC, 71 (28%) survived to discharge, and 67 (26%) with favorable survival. The median apnea interval during attempted tracheal intubation was 84 s (64-113 s). Median chest compression fraction was 85% overall and 87% during the apnea interval. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, a shorter apnea interval was associated with better outcomes: ROSC (72% vs 56%), survival (39% vs 25%), and favorable survival (39% vs 23%) (p < 0.05 for each comparison).

CONCLUSIONS: In this VF-OHCA cohort, shorter apnea intervals (≤60 s) were associated with greater likelihood of favorable outcomes. Given its variability and relationship to outcomes, the apnea interval may be a modifiable measure to improve OHCA survival.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты