Appetite · 2017
The relationship between gluten free diet adherence and depressive symptoms in adults with coeliac disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sainsbury Kirby, Marques Marta M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Depressive symptoms are common in patients with coeliac disease (CD) and may represent a barrier to gluten free diet (GFD) adherence. The aims of this meta-analysis were: (1) to synthesise the evidence on the relationship between depression or depressive symptoms and degree of adherence to a GFD in patients with CD who are already attempting a GFD (i.e., post-diagnosis and onset of GFD), and (2) to summarise the direction of causation of any observed relationship.
METHODS: A random effects meta-analysis of 8 cross-sectional studies (N = 1644) was conducted. Included studies measured self-reported depressive symptoms and GFD adherence using either a dietitian interview or validated self-report questionnaire that considered unintentional gluten consumption.
RESULTS: There was a moderate association between poorer GFD adherence and greater depressive symptoms (r = 0.398, 95% CI = 0.321-0.469), with marked heterogeneity in the effects (I2 = 66.8%). A sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a moderate/high (k = 1) or unclear risk of bias (k = 1) did not change the results.
CONCLUSION: The low number of studies meeting inclusion criteria limits the strength of the conclusions. Available evidence suggests there is an association between poorer GFD adherence and self-reported depressive symptoms; however, studies using longitudinal and prospective designs, and reliable measures, particularly for adherence, are needed to confirm this association. The direction of causation between depression and adherence remains unclear.
METHODS: A random effects meta-analysis of 8 cross-sectional studies (N = 1644) was conducted. Included studies measured self-reported depressive symptoms and GFD adherence using either a dietitian interview or validated self-report questionnaire that considered unintentional gluten consumption.
RESULTS: There was a moderate association between poorer GFD adherence and greater depressive symptoms (r = 0.398, 95% CI = 0.321-0.469), with marked heterogeneity in the effects (I2 = 66.8%). A sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a moderate/high (k = 1) or unclear risk of bias (k = 1) did not change the results.
CONCLUSION: The low number of studies meeting inclusion criteria limits the strength of the conclusions. Available evidence suggests there is an association between poorer GFD adherence and self-reported depressive symptoms; however, studies using longitudinal and prospective designs, and reliable measures, particularly for adherence, are needed to confirm this association. The direction of causation between depression and adherence remains unclear.