MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17474124.2017.1342536

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017

Medical versus surgical management of penetrating Crohn's disease: the current situation and future perspectives.

Patil Seema A, Cross Raymond K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The development of penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) occurs in up to 50% of patients over the course of their lifetime. While the presentation of these complications, including free perforation, intra-abdominal abscess, and enteric fistula, are usually obvious, the management can require a nuanced approach, with distinct short and long-term approaches. Areas covered: This review discusses medical and surgical methods of treating these complications, including the role of percutaneous drainage of abscesses, the implications of a stricture associated with a fistula, and the efficacy of postoperative anti-TNF therapy in preventing recurrence after surgical treatment. Expert commentary: An approach to the management of these complications that begins with control of sepsis, including broad-spectrum antibiotics, bowel rest, and nutritional support is proposed. The next appropriate step is a diagnostic evaluation to determine the utility of medical versus surgical therapy, considering the presence of a stricture and prior immunosuppressive therapy. Postoperative anti-TNF therapy, a highly effective method to prevent recurrence, should be considered in many cases.

Для цитирования: Patil Seema A, Cross Raymond K. Medical versus surgical management of penetrating Crohn's disease: the current situation and future perspectives.. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1342536.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.