International journal of surgery case reports · 2021
Fibrin glue-induced eosinophilic pleural effusion after pulmonary resection: A case report.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawamoto Nobutaka, Okita Riki, Okada Masanori, Ito Kosuke, Hirazawa Katsutoshi, Inokawa Hidetoshi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Prolonged air leakage after pulmonary resection is a common complication, and fibrin glue is used as a sealant to reduce this. Fibrin glue-induced adverse events are generally rare. Herein, we describe a rare case of fibrin glue-induced eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE).
CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old man underwent partial pulmonary resection for right lower lobe lung cancer, and the pulmonary staple stump was subsequently covered with fibrin glue. Antibacterial drugs were administered for the treatment of postoperative pneumonia. However, re-elevation of the inflammatory cell number was observed, and computed tomography revealed an increase in right pleural effusion. Although thoracoscopy was performed based on a possibility of empyema, no empyema was observed. The eosinophil count in the pleural effusion was 11%; thus, the patient was diagnosed with EPE, which was resolved after thoracic drainage, without corticosteroid administration. Fibrin glue was identified as the causative agent, using a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: EPE is defined as an eosinophil count of ≥10% in the pleural effusion. If pleural effusion on the surgical side, with fever or an elevated inflammatory cell number, is observed in the early postoperative period after pulmonary resection, empyema should be considered foremost. In this case, the administration of antibacterial drugs was ineffective, and the patient was eventually diagnosed with EPE.
CONCLUSION: EPE should be considered as a rare fibrin glue-induced adverse event after pulmonary resection. It is recommended that the leukocyte fraction be examined, if pleural effusion is collected for postoperative pleural effusion.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old man underwent partial pulmonary resection for right lower lobe lung cancer, and the pulmonary staple stump was subsequently covered with fibrin glue. Antibacterial drugs were administered for the treatment of postoperative pneumonia. However, re-elevation of the inflammatory cell number was observed, and computed tomography revealed an increase in right pleural effusion. Although thoracoscopy was performed based on a possibility of empyema, no empyema was observed. The eosinophil count in the pleural effusion was 11%; thus, the patient was diagnosed with EPE, which was resolved after thoracic drainage, without corticosteroid administration. Fibrin glue was identified as the causative agent, using a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: EPE is defined as an eosinophil count of ≥10% in the pleural effusion. If pleural effusion on the surgical side, with fever or an elevated inflammatory cell number, is observed in the early postoperative period after pulmonary resection, empyema should be considered foremost. In this case, the administration of antibacterial drugs was ineffective, and the patient was eventually diagnosed with EPE.
CONCLUSION: EPE should be considered as a rare fibrin glue-induced adverse event after pulmonary resection. It is recommended that the leukocyte fraction be examined, if pleural effusion is collected for postoperative pleural effusion.