Clinical oral implants research · 2012
Buccal and lingual bone level alterations after immediate implantation of four implant surfaces: a study in dogs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonfante Estevam A, Janal Malvin N, Granato Rodrigo, Marin Charles, Suzuki Marcelo, Tovar Nick, Coelho Paulo G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Bone formation and maintenance around implants placed immediately after tooth extraction may be affected by implant surface treatment and compromise long-term esthetic results. This study morphometrically evaluated buccal bone loss and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of four implant systems placed immediately after tooth extraction in a dog model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The premolars of eight beagle dogs were bilaterally extracted with a full-thickness flap, and root-form dental implants were placed on the root extraction socket. Implants (n = 16 each) with different surface treatments were placed from sites 1 to 4 and alternated between animals to allow evaluation of the same number of implants at sites and evaluation time points. Implant surface treatments were as follows: anodized, discrete crystalline deposition, SLActive, and microblasted. The left and right side provided implants that stayed for 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. Submerged healing was allowed and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and buccal bone loss were morphometrically measured. Linear mixed models (P < 0.05) were used to assess differences between groups, across time, and their interaction.
RESULTS: Buccal bone loss was observed to approximately double between 2 and 4 weeks (P = 0.01). BIC also increased between 2 and 4 weeks, by 20-25% (P = 0.01). These changes were statistically similar for each surface.
CONCLUSION: When placed immediately after tooth extraction, the evaluated histomorphometric parameters vary only with time.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The premolars of eight beagle dogs were bilaterally extracted with a full-thickness flap, and root-form dental implants were placed on the root extraction socket. Implants (n = 16 each) with different surface treatments were placed from sites 1 to 4 and alternated between animals to allow evaluation of the same number of implants at sites and evaluation time points. Implant surface treatments were as follows: anodized, discrete crystalline deposition, SLActive, and microblasted. The left and right side provided implants that stayed for 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. Submerged healing was allowed and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and buccal bone loss were morphometrically measured. Linear mixed models (P < 0.05) were used to assess differences between groups, across time, and their interaction.
RESULTS: Buccal bone loss was observed to approximately double between 2 and 4 weeks (P = 0.01). BIC also increased between 2 and 4 weeks, by 20-25% (P = 0.01). These changes were statistically similar for each surface.
CONCLUSION: When placed immediately after tooth extraction, the evaluated histomorphometric parameters vary only with time.