Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2015
[MRI features of phyllodes tumor of the breast and the pathological study].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hou Weiwei, Yu Xiaoping
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the features of MRI and pathology for phyllodes tumor of the breast and to improve the diagnosis level.
METHODS: The MRI data of 11 patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast were analyzed. The MRI features included morphology, signal intensity on pre-enhanced T1WI, appearance of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE-MRI) and the type of time-signal intensity curve (TIC).
RESULTS: The pathologic diagnosis for the 11 phyllodes tumor included 6 benign, 2 borderline and 3 malignant. All of the 11 tumors showed well-defined margins and lobulated lump. The signal intensity of tumor was lower (4 cases) than or equal (7 cases) to that of normal breast tissue on T1-weighted images. On T2-weighted images, 5 cases presented variegated appearance, 6 cases displayed high signal. Four cases showed patchy high signal on T1WI and T2WI. All patients underwent DCE-MRI and showed uneven enhancement. There were 7 cases in type I of TIC and 4 cases in type II.
CONCLUSION: The imaging findings of phyllodes tumor on MR is characteristic but not specific, the final diagnosis still depends on the histopathologic examination.
METHODS: The MRI data of 11 patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast were analyzed. The MRI features included morphology, signal intensity on pre-enhanced T1WI, appearance of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE-MRI) and the type of time-signal intensity curve (TIC).
RESULTS: The pathologic diagnosis for the 11 phyllodes tumor included 6 benign, 2 borderline and 3 malignant. All of the 11 tumors showed well-defined margins and lobulated lump. The signal intensity of tumor was lower (4 cases) than or equal (7 cases) to that of normal breast tissue on T1-weighted images. On T2-weighted images, 5 cases presented variegated appearance, 6 cases displayed high signal. Four cases showed patchy high signal on T1WI and T2WI. All patients underwent DCE-MRI and showed uneven enhancement. There were 7 cases in type I of TIC and 4 cases in type II.
CONCLUSION: The imaging findings of phyllodes tumor on MR is characteristic but not specific, the final diagnosis still depends on the histopathologic examination.