Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
A multi-sensor wearable system for the assessment of diseased gait in real-world conditions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Salis Francesca, Bertuletti Stefano, Bonci Tecla, Caruso Marco, Scott Kirsty, Alcock Lisa, Buckley Ellen, Gazit Eran, Hansen Clint, Schwickert Lars, Aminian Kamiar, Becker Clemens, Brown Philip, Carsin Anne-Elie, Caulfield Brian, Chiari Lorenzo, D'Ascanio Ilaria, Del Din Silvia, Eskofier Bjoern M, Garcia-Aymerich Judith, Hausdorff Jeffrey M, Hume Emily C, Kirk Cameron, Kluge Felix, Koch Sarah, Kuederle Arne, Maetzler Walter, Micó-Amigo Encarna M, Mueller Arne, Neatrour Isabel, Paraschiv-Ionescu Anisoara, Palmerini Luca, Yarnall Alison J, Rochester Lynn, Sharrack Basil, Singleton David, Vereijken Beatrix, Vogiatzis Ioannis, Della Croce Ugo, Mazzà Claudia, Cereatti Andrea, For The Mobilise-D Consortium
Аннотация
Introduction: Accurately assessing people's gait, especially in real-world conditions and in case of impaired mobility, is still a challenge due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors resulting in gait complexity. To improve the estimation of gait-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) in real-world scenarios, this study presents a wearable multi-sensor system (INDIP), integrating complementary sensing approaches (two plantar pressure insoles, three inertial units and two distance sensors). Methods: The INDIP technical validity was assessed against stereophotogrammetry during a laboratory experimental protocol comprising structured tests (including continuous curvilinear and rectilinear walking and steps) and a simulation of daily-life activities (including intermittent gait and short walking bouts). To evaluate its performance on various gait patterns, data were collected on 128 participants from seven cohorts: healthy young and older adults, patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and proximal femur fracture. Moreover, INDIP usability was evaluated by recording 2.5-h of real-world unsupervised activity. Results and discussion: Excellent absolute agreement (ICC >0.95) and very limited mean absolute errors were observed for all cohorts and digital mobility outcomes (cadence ≤0.61 steps/min, stride length ≤0.02 m, walking speed ≤0.02 m/s) in the structured tests. Larger, but limited, errors were observed during the daily-life simulation (cadence 2.72-4.87 steps/min, stride length 0.04-0.06 m, walking speed 0.03-0.05 m/s). Neither major technical nor usability issues were declared during the 2.5-h acquisitions. Therefore, the INDIP system can be considered a valid and feasible solution to collect reference data for analyzing gait in real-world conditions.