Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021
The risk of consequent nephropathy following initial weight loss in diabetic patients treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Yi-Hsin, Chen Shao-Wei, Chao Tze-Fan, Kao Yi-Wei, Huang Chien-Ying, Chu Pao-Hsien
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a controversy over the association between obesity and the risk of renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Furthermore, whether body weight (BW) loss following sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) treatment associated with risk of adverse renal events is unknown.
METHODS: We used medical data from a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan, enrolling 8992 T2DM patients with a baseline/following-up BW data available after around 12 weeks of SGLT2i treatment, from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Patients were followed up until the occurrence of composite renal outcome (estimated glomerular filtration rate decline > 40% or end-stage kidney disease) or the end of study period, whichever occurred first.
RESULTS: Participants were divided into six baseline BMI categories: < 18.5 (n = 55); 18.5-22.9 (n = 985); 23.0-24.9 (n = 1389); 25.0-29.9 (n = 3941); 30.0-34.9 (n = 1973); and ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 (n = 649). There were 38.9%, 23.5%, 24.7%, 8.4%, 2.7%, and 1.8% of patients experienced no-BW loss, initial BW loss of 0.0-2.4%, 2.5-4.9%, 5.0-7.4%, 7.5-9.9%, and ≥ 10.0%, associated with SGLT2i treatment, respectively. Compared with patients with normal BMI (BMI: 18.5-22.9 kg/m2), underweight (BMI: < 18.5 kg/m2) was associated with a higher risk of composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence intervals (CI)]: 2.17; [1.16-4.04]), whereas pre-obese (BMI: 25.0-29.9 kg/m2) associated with the lowest risk of composite renal outcome (0.52; [0.40-0.68]) after multivariate adjustment. Compared with those without BW loss after SGLT2i treatment, BW loss of 0.0-2.4% (0.55; [0.43-0.70]) and 2.5-4.9% (0.78; [0.63-0.98]) were associated with a lower risk, whereas BW loss ≥ 10.0% associated with a higher risk of composite renal outcome (1.61; [1.06-2.46]) after multivariate adjustment.
CONCLUSION: A modest BW loss of 0-5% associated with SGLT2i treatment was associated with a favorable renal outcome. Caution should be taken for whom are underweight at baseline or have a pronounced BW loss ≥ 10.0% associated with SGLT2i treatment, which was associated with a worse renal outcome.
METHODS: We used medical data from a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan, enrolling 8992 T2DM patients with a baseline/following-up BW data available after around 12 weeks of SGLT2i treatment, from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Patients were followed up until the occurrence of composite renal outcome (estimated glomerular filtration rate decline > 40% or end-stage kidney disease) or the end of study period, whichever occurred first.
RESULTS: Participants were divided into six baseline BMI categories: < 18.5 (n = 55); 18.5-22.9 (n = 985); 23.0-24.9 (n = 1389); 25.0-29.9 (n = 3941); 30.0-34.9 (n = 1973); and ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 (n = 649). There were 38.9%, 23.5%, 24.7%, 8.4%, 2.7%, and 1.8% of patients experienced no-BW loss, initial BW loss of 0.0-2.4%, 2.5-4.9%, 5.0-7.4%, 7.5-9.9%, and ≥ 10.0%, associated with SGLT2i treatment, respectively. Compared with patients with normal BMI (BMI: 18.5-22.9 kg/m2), underweight (BMI: < 18.5 kg/m2) was associated with a higher risk of composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence intervals (CI)]: 2.17; [1.16-4.04]), whereas pre-obese (BMI: 25.0-29.9 kg/m2) associated with the lowest risk of composite renal outcome (0.52; [0.40-0.68]) after multivariate adjustment. Compared with those without BW loss after SGLT2i treatment, BW loss of 0.0-2.4% (0.55; [0.43-0.70]) and 2.5-4.9% (0.78; [0.63-0.98]) were associated with a lower risk, whereas BW loss ≥ 10.0% associated with a higher risk of composite renal outcome (1.61; [1.06-2.46]) after multivariate adjustment.
CONCLUSION: A modest BW loss of 0-5% associated with SGLT2i treatment was associated with a favorable renal outcome. Caution should be taken for whom are underweight at baseline or have a pronounced BW loss ≥ 10.0% associated with SGLT2i treatment, which was associated with a worse renal outcome.