Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2018
Insulin resistance in hidradenitis suppurativa: a case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vilanova I, Hernández J L, Mata C, Durán C, García-Unzueta M T, Portilla V, Fuentevilla P, Corrales A, González-Vela M C, González-Gay M A, Blanco R, González-López M A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The association between chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and insulin resistance (IR) has been well established. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that affects the apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the prevalence of IR in patients with HS.
METHODS: This cross-sectional, case-control study enrolled 137 subjects, 76 patients with HS and 61 age- and gender-matched controls. Demographic data, clinical examination of HS patients, anthropometric measures, cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory studies were recorded. The homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was calculated in all participants by measuring fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels.
RESULTS: The median (IQR) HOMA-IR value in HS patients was significantly higher [2.0 (1.0-3.6)] than in controls [1.5 (0.9-2.3)] (P = 0.01). The prevalence of IR was significantly higher in cases (43.4%) compared with controls (16.4%) (P = 0.001). In the linear regression multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index (BMI), HS remained as a significant factor for a higher HOMA-IR [2.51 (0.18) vs 1.92(0.21); P = 0.04]. The HOMA-IR value and the prevalence of IR did not differ significantly among HS patients grouped by severity of the disease.
CONCLUSION: Our results show an increased frequency of IR in HS. Thus, we suggest HS patients to be evaluated for IR and managed accordingly.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the prevalence of IR in patients with HS.
METHODS: This cross-sectional, case-control study enrolled 137 subjects, 76 patients with HS and 61 age- and gender-matched controls. Demographic data, clinical examination of HS patients, anthropometric measures, cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory studies were recorded. The homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was calculated in all participants by measuring fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels.
RESULTS: The median (IQR) HOMA-IR value in HS patients was significantly higher [2.0 (1.0-3.6)] than in controls [1.5 (0.9-2.3)] (P = 0.01). The prevalence of IR was significantly higher in cases (43.4%) compared with controls (16.4%) (P = 0.001). In the linear regression multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index (BMI), HS remained as a significant factor for a higher HOMA-IR [2.51 (0.18) vs 1.92(0.21); P = 0.04]. The HOMA-IR value and the prevalence of IR did not differ significantly among HS patients grouped by severity of the disease.
CONCLUSION: Our results show an increased frequency of IR in HS. Thus, we suggest HS patients to be evaluated for IR and managed accordingly.