Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2008
Normal response inhibition in boys with Tourette syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roessner Veit, Albrecht Björn, Dechent Peter, Baudewig Jürgen, Rothenberger Aribert
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Inhibitory deficits are often a matter of debate in the pathophysiology of Tourette syndrome (TS). Previous neuropsychological studies on behavioral inhibition revealed equivocal results.
METHODS: To overcome existing shortcomings (e.g. confounders like medication status, comorbid conditions) we compared medication naïve boys (10-14 years) suffering exclusively from TS with age, gender and IQ matched healthy controls using a highly demanding Go/Nogo task that controls for novelty effects.
RESULTS: The performance did not differ between boys with TS and healthy boys.
CONCLUSION: In TS normal response inhibition performance as measured by a Go/Nogo task can be assumed. However, there might be neurophysiological abnormalities in TS possibly related to compensatory mechanisms to control for tics. Hence, further studies combining neuropsychological and neurophysiological methods (e.g. electroencephalography, fMRI) using the same strictly controlled design along the whole range of development and tic severity are recommended.
METHODS: To overcome existing shortcomings (e.g. confounders like medication status, comorbid conditions) we compared medication naïve boys (10-14 years) suffering exclusively from TS with age, gender and IQ matched healthy controls using a highly demanding Go/Nogo task that controls for novelty effects.
RESULTS: The performance did not differ between boys with TS and healthy boys.
CONCLUSION: In TS normal response inhibition performance as measured by a Go/Nogo task can be assumed. However, there might be neurophysiological abnormalities in TS possibly related to compensatory mechanisms to control for tics. Hence, further studies combining neuropsychological and neurophysiological methods (e.g. electroencephalography, fMRI) using the same strictly controlled design along the whole range of development and tic severity are recommended.