Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
Frontotemporal dementia: Past, present, and future.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ulugut Hulya, Pijnenburg Yolande A L
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The history of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is both old and new. This study explores its historical roots, dating back to the 19th century, while recognizes it as a distinct neurological entity only a few decades ago.
METHODS: This qualitative study and literature review provides an overview of FTD's historical background, birth, evolution, and future directions.
RESULTS: Recognition of FTD was hindered by rigid perceptions of dementia, the division between neurology and psychiatry, reliance on IQ-based assessment, limited neuroimaging capabilities, and lack of pathological proof. Overcoming these barriers involved revisiting early pioneers' approaches, focusing on focal impairment, establishing non-Alzheimer's disease cohorts, fostering collaboration, and developing diagnostic criteria. Current gaps include the need for biology-oriented psychiatry education, biological biomarkers, and culturally sensitive, objective clinical instruments predicting underlying pathology.
DISCUSSION: Independent multidisciplinary centers are essential. The future of FTD lies in disease-modifying therapies, presenting new opportunities for healthcare professionals and researchers.
METHODS: This qualitative study and literature review provides an overview of FTD's historical background, birth, evolution, and future directions.
RESULTS: Recognition of FTD was hindered by rigid perceptions of dementia, the division between neurology and psychiatry, reliance on IQ-based assessment, limited neuroimaging capabilities, and lack of pathological proof. Overcoming these barriers involved revisiting early pioneers' approaches, focusing on focal impairment, establishing non-Alzheimer's disease cohorts, fostering collaboration, and developing diagnostic criteria. Current gaps include the need for biology-oriented psychiatry education, biological biomarkers, and culturally sensitive, objective clinical instruments predicting underlying pathology.
DISCUSSION: Independent multidisciplinary centers are essential. The future of FTD lies in disease-modifying therapies, presenting new opportunities for healthcare professionals and researchers.