Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology · 2017
[Comparative study of pain releasing effect of two approaches to acute pulpitis in the night emergency].
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Jian, Shi Cun-Shan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effect of 2 methods for acute pulpitis in the night emergency.
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into experimental group (107 cases) and control group (109 cases). Patients in the experimental group was enclosed formaldehyde cresol (FC) with CAVITON-GC after removal of crown pulp, while patients in the control group was treated with open drainage. Pain releasing effect was evaluated and analyzed 2 days after treatment．The data were analysed by t test and χ2 test with SPSS19.0 software package.
RESULTS: The average pain index of the experimental group was 1.23, which was lower than that of the control group (3.58), the difference was significant (P<0.05). The treatment efficiency was 93.46% in the experimental group, significantly higher than that in the control group (77.98%, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in the experimental group is more effective to relieve pain than simple drainage in the control group.
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into experimental group (107 cases) and control group (109 cases). Patients in the experimental group was enclosed formaldehyde cresol (FC) with CAVITON-GC after removal of crown pulp, while patients in the control group was treated with open drainage. Pain releasing effect was evaluated and analyzed 2 days after treatment．The data were analysed by t test and χ2 test with SPSS19.0 software package.
RESULTS: The average pain index of the experimental group was 1.23, which was lower than that of the control group (3.58), the difference was significant (P<0.05). The treatment efficiency was 93.46% in the experimental group, significantly higher than that in the control group (77.98%, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in the experimental group is more effective to relieve pain than simple drainage in the control group.