Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025
High-volume online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis: a short review of recent evidence and a discussion on clinical implementation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blankestijn Peter J
Аннотация
Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has received significant attention as a potentially superior dialysis modality compared to conventional high-flux hemodialysis for patients with end-stage kidney disease. The CONVINCE (CONvective VERSus diffusive dialysis in patients with End-stage kidney disease) trial, subsequent meta-analyses, and observational studies indicate that high-dose HDF (≥23 L convection per session) is associated with improved survival outcomes, particularly through reductions in cardiovascular and possibly also infection-related mortality. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests modest but meaningful benefits in health-related quality of life and symptom control. This comment synthesizes the current literature (2022-2025), highlighting clinical outcomes, patient-centered metrics, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, personalized treatment considerations, and implications for clinical practice. Additionally, practical prescription guidance is provided to assist nephrologists in achieving optimal convection volumes and clinical outcomes in routine clinical practice.