JACC. Asia · 2024
Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Stratification of Combined Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation: The China-VHD Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lv Junxing, Lu Qianhong, Wang Weiwei, Ye Yunqing, Li Zhe, Zhang Bin, Zhao Qinghao, Zhang Haitong, Liu Qingrong, Zhao Zhenyan, Wang Bincheng, Yu Zikai, Guo Shuai, Duan Zhenya, Zhao Yanyan, Gao Runlin, Xu Haiyan, Ge Junbo, Wu Yongjian, CHINA-VHD Collaborators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Combined mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is related to more complicated hemodynamic burdens than isolated atrioventricular valve regurgitation.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of combined MR and TR, as well as developing dedicated prognostic instruments.
METHODS: A total of 6,704 patients with ≥ moderate MR or TR from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in this analysis. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and worsening functional status or death within 2 years.
RESULTS: Compared with those with isolated valvular regurgitation, patients with combined MR and TR more often experienced atrial fibrillation or flutter and pulmonary hypertension. During a median follow-up of 733 days (Q1, Q3: 706, 749 days), 624 (9.3%) deaths occurred. Combined MR and TR was related to poorer 2-year outcomes than isolated MR, and was independently associated with worse prognosis in symptomatic patients (all-cause mortality: MR vs MR+TR, HR: 0.776 [95% CI: 0.616-0.978]; P = 0.031) and those with normal left ventricular systolic function (composite endpoint: HR: 0.629 [95% CI: 0.400-0.990]; P = 0.045). Based on carefully evaluated predictors of mortality, a prognostic nomogram and a risk score were developed and externally validated for patients with combined MR and TR, with superior predictive performance than the MitraScore and comparable discrimination compared with artificial intelligence-derived models.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with combined MR and TR displayed worse clinical profiles and poorer outcomes compared with those with isolated MR. The novel prognostic tools may improve personalized risk assessment of combined MR and TR.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of combined MR and TR, as well as developing dedicated prognostic instruments.
METHODS: A total of 6,704 patients with ≥ moderate MR or TR from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in this analysis. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and worsening functional status or death within 2 years.
RESULTS: Compared with those with isolated valvular regurgitation, patients with combined MR and TR more often experienced atrial fibrillation or flutter and pulmonary hypertension. During a median follow-up of 733 days (Q1, Q3: 706, 749 days), 624 (9.3%) deaths occurred. Combined MR and TR was related to poorer 2-year outcomes than isolated MR, and was independently associated with worse prognosis in symptomatic patients (all-cause mortality: MR vs MR+TR, HR: 0.776 [95% CI: 0.616-0.978]; P = 0.031) and those with normal left ventricular systolic function (composite endpoint: HR: 0.629 [95% CI: 0.400-0.990]; P = 0.045). Based on carefully evaluated predictors of mortality, a prognostic nomogram and a risk score were developed and externally validated for patients with combined MR and TR, with superior predictive performance than the MitraScore and comparable discrimination compared with artificial intelligence-derived models.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with combined MR and TR displayed worse clinical profiles and poorer outcomes compared with those with isolated MR. The novel prognostic tools may improve personalized risk assessment of combined MR and TR.