MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mnh.0000000000001132

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2025

Artificial intelligence in kidney disease and dialysis: from data mining to clinical impact.

Neri Luca, Zhang Hanjie, Usvyat Len A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly transforming healthcare, but their adoption in nephrology and dialysis remains relatively limited.

RECENT FINDINGS: This review highlights key applications of AI in kidney disease, including prognostic modeling, imaging, personalized anemia and fluid management, patient engagement, and research acceleration. While numerous studies demonstrate improved prediction accuracy and clinical insights, translation into routine practice is rare. Examples such as the Anemia Control Model (ACM) demonstrate that AI can simultaneously improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs, though widespread adoption will require rigorous validation, seamless integration into clinical workflows, regulatory approval, and above all, clinician trust.

SUMMARY: AI in nephrology shows promise for personalized care and cost reduction, as demonstrated by tools like the Anemia Control Model. Yet, broad adoption requires rigorous validation, seamless workflow integration, regulatory clearance, and clinician trust. Future opportunities include digital twins, large language models, and multiomics integration, with AI poised to enhance both patient outcomes and system performance.

Для цитирования: Neri Luca, Zhang Hanjie, Usvyat Len A. Artificial intelligence in kidney disease and dialysis: from data mining to clinical impact.. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000001132.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.