MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.011

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2013

Assessment of immediate pain relief with laser treatment in recurrent aphthous stomatitis.

Prasad R Shesha, Pai Anuradha

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To compare immediate pain relief, healing time between minor recurrent aphthous ulcers treated with a single session of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and a placebo.

STUDY

DESIGN

A prospective clinical study was performed on 25 patients with minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Pretreatment pain levels were recorded using a numerical rating scale. Ulcers were randomized to either receive treatment or placebo. Pain levels were assessed immediately after treatment and after 24 h. Healing was assessed on days 3 and 4, and once every 2 days thereafter for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean pain scores in the laser group were significantly reduced immediately after treatment (0.68 ± 0.6) compared with pretreatment (8.48 ± 0.71; P < .001). In contrast, the placebo group showed little difference in pain scores between pretreatment (8.08 ± 0.70) and immediately after treatment (7.96 ± 0.84). In the laser group, significant improvements in healing times were observed (4.08 ± 0.81 vs. 7.84 ± 0.90 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

CO2 laser therapy in recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) provides immediate pain relief sustained over 24 h, along with accelerated healing time.

Для цитирования: Prasad R Shesha, Pai Anuradha. Assessment of immediate pain relief with laser treatment in recurrent aphthous stomatitis.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.