MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.287.24.3238

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2002

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial.

Keenan Sean P, Powers Caroline, McCormack David G, Block Gary

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing the need for endotracheal intubation in some patients who present with acute respiratory failure. It is also used for patients who develop acute respiratory distress after extubation, but there are no randomized controlled trials that address its effectiveness in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of NPPV compared with standard medical therapy in preventing the need for endotracheal reintubation in high-risk patients who develop respiratory distress during the first 48 hours after extubation.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, unblinded study with concealed allocation conducted between August 1, 1996 and October 31, 1999.

SETTING

An intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic, tertiary care hospital in Ontario.

PATIENTS: Eighty-one patients with a history of cardiac or respiratory disease or who initially required ventilatory support for more than 2 days and who developed respiratory distress within 48 hours of extubation.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard medical therapy alone (supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry > or = 95%; n = 42) or NPPV by face mask plus standard medical therapy (n = 39).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of reintubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Comparing the NPPV group with the standard-therapy group, there was no difference in the rate of reintubation (72% vs 69%; relative risk, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.38) or hospital mortality (31% for both groups; relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.91). Similarly, no difference was found in duration of mechanical ventilation or length of ICU or hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of NPPV to standard medical therapy does not improve outcome in heterogeneous groups of patients who develop respiratory distress during the first 48 hours after extubation.

Для цитирования: Keenan Sean P, Powers Caroline, McCormack David G, Block Gary. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial.. JAMA. 2002. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.24.3238.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.