MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000002823

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2023

Validation of the PCL-5, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 in a Sample of First Responders.

Ahmadi Aazi, Galusha Jeanine M, Ponder Warren N, Carbajal Jose, Schuman Donna L, Whitworth James, Yockey R Andrew

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

First responders (FRs) commonly present for treatment with complex symptom constellations that frequently include posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety. To date, no FR study has validated these measures on a treatment-seeking sample.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to validate measures that assess these constructs (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) on a treatment-seeking sample of FRs ( N = 390).

RESULTS

The seven-factor posttraumatic stress disorder hybrid configuration was the best fit. The best fitting factor model of the depression measure was a two-factor structure, cognitive-affective and somatic depression. Lastly, generalized anxiety was a unidimensional construct.

LIMITATIONS: Follow-up studies should validate these measures on each FR subtype.

CONCLUSION

We position these findings within the FR literature, review clinical implications for providers, and offer recommendations for future research.

Для цитирования: Ahmadi Aazi, Galusha Jeanine M, Ponder Warren N, Carbajal Jose, Schuman Donna L, Whitworth James, Yockey R Andrew. Validation of the PCL-5, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 in a Sample of First Responders.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002823.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.