Critical care medicine · 2000
Spontaneous variability of cardiac output in ventilated critically ill patients.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang C C, Tsai Y H, Chen N H, Lin M C, Tsao T C, Lee C H, Hsu K H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To define the magnitude of spontaneous cardiac output variability over time in sedated medical intensive care unit patients attached to a continuous cardiac output monitor, and to determine whether high level positive end-expiratory pressure or inverse inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio ventilation resulted in greater variability over time than low positive end-expiratory pressure with conventional I:E ratio ventilation.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Medical intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center.
PATIENTS: A total of 22 hemodynamically stable acute respiratory failure patients with a pulmonary artery catheter inserted for hemodynamic monitoring
INTERVENTIONS: After being sedated, patients were randomized ultimately to receive pressure control ventilation first at setting A (high positive end-expiratory pressure [15 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]) and then at setting B (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with inverse I:E ratio [2:1]), or vice versa, and then at setting C (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac output (CO) was measured continuously. The continuous CO value displayed was updated every 30-60 secs. The updated value reflected an average of the previous 3-6 mins. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CO for each setting in each patient was calculated to represent the spontaneous variability. The mean CO+/-SD and CV of each setting was 5.7+/-1.8 L/min and 4.4% for setting A, 5.6+/-1.5 L/min and 4.6% for setting B, and 5.9+/-1.7 L/min and 4.8% for setting C. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the CVs of the three settings. The 95% confidence interval for the COs for each setting was approximately the mean CO+/-0.1 x mean CO measured.
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill sedated medical intensive care unit patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of cardiac output over time was not significant. High positive end-expiratory pressure (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1) did not contribute to increased spontaneous variability of cardiac output.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Medical intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center.
PATIENTS: A total of 22 hemodynamically stable acute respiratory failure patients with a pulmonary artery catheter inserted for hemodynamic monitoring
INTERVENTIONS: After being sedated, patients were randomized ultimately to receive pressure control ventilation first at setting A (high positive end-expiratory pressure [15 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]) and then at setting B (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with inverse I:E ratio [2:1]), or vice versa, and then at setting C (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac output (CO) was measured continuously. The continuous CO value displayed was updated every 30-60 secs. The updated value reflected an average of the previous 3-6 mins. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CO for each setting in each patient was calculated to represent the spontaneous variability. The mean CO+/-SD and CV of each setting was 5.7+/-1.8 L/min and 4.4% for setting A, 5.6+/-1.5 L/min and 4.6% for setting B, and 5.9+/-1.7 L/min and 4.8% for setting C. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the CVs of the three settings. The 95% confidence interval for the COs for each setting was approximately the mean CO+/-0.1 x mean CO measured.
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill sedated medical intensive care unit patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of cardiac output over time was not significant. High positive end-expiratory pressure (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1) did not contribute to increased spontaneous variability of cardiac output.