Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2020
The success rate of oral appliances based on multiple criteria according to obstructive sleep apnoea severity, BMI and age: A large multicentre study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okuno Kentaro, Furuhashi Akifumi, Nakamura Shuhei, Suzuki Hiroshi, Arisaka Takehiro, Taga Hitoshi, Tamura Masataka, Katahira Haruto, Furuhata Minoru, Iida Chisato
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of oral appliance (OA) varies greatly in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).
OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the success rate of OA for OSA patients.
METHODS: This study was based on a cross-sectional multicentre survey of OA therapy for the management of OSA called the JAMS (Japanese Cross-sectional Multicenter Survey) Study performed at 10 medical institutions. A total of 442 patients fulfilled the selection criteria, which patients had worn OA, and undergone overnight polysomnography to assess both the pre-treatment baseline and follow-up for OA. Age, sex, BMI and apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) at the time of diagnosis and follow-up for OA were extracted.
RESULTS: After OA treatment, the mean AHI decreased from 22.6 ± 13.8 to 10.0 ± 10.2/h, and the mean rate of decrease in the AHI was 52.5 ± 38.4%. Regarding the success rate to OA therapy, criterion 1 (AHI < 5/h), criterion 2 (AHI < 10/h), criterion 3 (AHI < 15/h) and criterion 4 (AHI reduction rate ≥ 50%) accounted for 33.5, 66.3, 80.5 and 63.3%, respectively. The success rate of OA treatment decreased according to the increase in OSA severity, obesity level (higher BMI) and older age.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the treatment success rate of OA on multiple criteria according to OSA severity, BMI and age. It may support for the clinician to make a decision on the OSA management.
OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the success rate of OA for OSA patients.
METHODS: This study was based on a cross-sectional multicentre survey of OA therapy for the management of OSA called the JAMS (Japanese Cross-sectional Multicenter Survey) Study performed at 10 medical institutions. A total of 442 patients fulfilled the selection criteria, which patients had worn OA, and undergone overnight polysomnography to assess both the pre-treatment baseline and follow-up for OA. Age, sex, BMI and apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) at the time of diagnosis and follow-up for OA were extracted.
RESULTS: After OA treatment, the mean AHI decreased from 22.6 ± 13.8 to 10.0 ± 10.2/h, and the mean rate of decrease in the AHI was 52.5 ± 38.4%. Regarding the success rate to OA therapy, criterion 1 (AHI < 5/h), criterion 2 (AHI < 10/h), criterion 3 (AHI < 15/h) and criterion 4 (AHI reduction rate ≥ 50%) accounted for 33.5, 66.3, 80.5 and 63.3%, respectively. The success rate of OA treatment decreased according to the increase in OSA severity, obesity level (higher BMI) and older age.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the treatment success rate of OA on multiple criteria according to OSA severity, BMI and age. It may support for the clinician to make a decision on the OSA management.