Brain stimulation · 2013
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary foot motor area in Parkinson's disease.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maruo Tomoyuki, Hosomi Koichi, Shimokawa Toshio, Kishima Haruhiko, Oshino Satoru, Morris Shayne, Kageyama Yu, Yokoe Masaru, Yoshimine Toshiki, Saitoh Youichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to be clinically effective for treating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Few studies have been performed reporting the effects of rTMS on non-motor symptoms such as depression and apathy in PD.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of high-frequency (HF) rTMS over the primary motor (M1) foot area on motor symptoms, depression and apathy scales, and sensory symptoms in PD.
METHODS: We investigated the efficacy of 3 consecutive days of HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area in 21 patients with PD using a randomized, double-blind cross-over trial compared with sham stimulation. Motor effects were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III), the self-assessment motor score, the visual analog scale (VAS), the 10-m walking test, and finger tapping. Non-motor effects were analyzed using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Apathy Scale, and quantitative sensory testing.
RESULTS: HF-rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III (P < 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), the walking test (P = 0.014), self-assessment motor score (P = 0.010), and finger tapping measurement (P < 0.05) compared to sham stimulation. In contrast, no significant improvement was observed in depression and apathy scales. Consecutive days of rTMS did not significantly increase the improvement in motor symptoms. There were no adverse effects following rTMS on patients with PD.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area significantly improved motor symptoms in patients with PD. In addition, daily repeated stimulation was not significantly more effective than a single session of stimulation, but may be effective for maintaining the improvement in motor symptoms in patients with PD.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of high-frequency (HF) rTMS over the primary motor (M1) foot area on motor symptoms, depression and apathy scales, and sensory symptoms in PD.
METHODS: We investigated the efficacy of 3 consecutive days of HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area in 21 patients with PD using a randomized, double-blind cross-over trial compared with sham stimulation. Motor effects were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III), the self-assessment motor score, the visual analog scale (VAS), the 10-m walking test, and finger tapping. Non-motor effects were analyzed using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Apathy Scale, and quantitative sensory testing.
RESULTS: HF-rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III (P < 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), the walking test (P = 0.014), self-assessment motor score (P = 0.010), and finger tapping measurement (P < 0.05) compared to sham stimulation. In contrast, no significant improvement was observed in depression and apathy scales. Consecutive days of rTMS did not significantly increase the improvement in motor symptoms. There were no adverse effects following rTMS on patients with PD.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area significantly improved motor symptoms in patients with PD. In addition, daily repeated stimulation was not significantly more effective than a single session of stimulation, but may be effective for maintaining the improvement in motor symptoms in patients with PD.